透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.16.212.99
  • 學位論文

青少年家庭依附與偏差行為之動態分析

The Dynamics of Juvenile Deviance and Family Attachment

指導教授 : 周愫嫻
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


Hirschi (1969) 認為家庭是抑制青少年偏差行為的重要力量,然而不論是偏差行為或者是家庭依附,均會隨著個體的發展而呈現變化,故家庭依附對青少年偏差行為的抑制力亦可能出現變化,偏差行為的出現則可能成為減弱家庭與青少年間連結的因素。本研究嘗試從Thornberry (1987) 互動觀點的角度出發,並以縱貫性資料探討在青少年發展過程中,家庭依附與偏差行為的變化關係。 本研究以中央研究院社會學研究所「青少年成長歷程研究」長期追蹤計劃蒐集資料做為分析,探討青少年從國一到國三之間,家庭依附與偏差行為之間的交互影響關係。本研究之目的為:(1)探索青少年的家庭依附於三年間之變化趨勢;(2)探索青少年的偏差行為於三年間之變化趨勢;(3)兩者間的互動影響關係;(4)兩者間的因果關係。 研究結果顯示,家庭依附在三年中呈現遞減的趨勢,偏差行為則呈現遞增的趨勢。在個體的發展過程中,家庭與個人間存在著一個互動的過程,家庭確實具有減少偏差行為的功能,但在青少年時期家庭的力量並不足遏止所有偏差行為的發生,一旦偏差行為出現將會使個人與家庭間的關係惡化。此研究透過縱貫資料的分析,補充了過去台灣犯罪學實證研究中忽視的一面。

並列摘要


Hirschi (1969) argues family has the function of reducing adolescent’s deviant behavior. However, either deviant behavior or family attachment would vary as individuals grow up. Therefore, the reducing function of family attachment may also vary as individuals grow up and the appearance of deviant behavior may also weaken the bonding between adolescents and their own families. Through the interaction view of Thornberry (1987), this research would explore the developmental relationship between family attachment and deviant behavior. By using the data of “Taiwan Youth Survey”, this research would examine the interaction relationship between family attachment and deviant behavior of Taiwanese adolescent during age 13 to 15. The purposes of this research are: first, to explore the development trend of family attachment during these 3 years; second, to explore the development trend of deviant behavior during these 3 years; third, to analyze the interaction relationship between family attachment and deviant behavior; fourth, to examine the casual relationship between family attachment and deviant behavior. The result shows that family attachment decreased from age 13 to 15 while deviant behavior shows an increased trend. From the perspective of individual developmental process, there is an interactional relationship exist between family and individual. That is family has the function of reducing adolescent’s deviant behavior, but this is not enough to reduce all the deviant behavior. While deviant behavior is appeared, the bonding between family and individual would also weaken.

參考文獻


林淑芬、林衢良,2008,〈依附、自我控制、逸樂休閒和偏差同儕對偏差行為的解釋模式 —— 以中區大專院校一年級學生為例〉,《運動休閒餐旅研究》,3 :141-155。
陳易甫、吳齊殷、林桂綉,2009,〈父母教養與青少年偏差行為的長期動態關聯 —— 一個群組成長軌跡模型〉,《犯罪與刑事司法研究》,12 : 59-100。
董旭英、王文玲,2007,〈國高中生依附父母、接觸偏差同儕、傳統價值觀念與偏差行為的關聯性之差異性研究〉,《犯罪學期刊》,10 : 29-48。
陳暢偉,2008,《澳門青少年對賭博的態度與行為:四個犯罪學理論的驗證研究》。國立台灣大學犯罪學研究所碩士論文。
曾幼涵,2001,《解析青少年犯罪率高峰之現象:「低自我控制」「與成熟代溝」之再議》。國立政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文。

被引用紀錄


羅玉珠(2011)。外在社會控制、內在價值信仰與兒童偏差行為相關性之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0607201114012000
林嬌玲(2013)。國中生集體染髮的行為密碼與適當性〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1407201300450800
張逸航(2014)。後母班與偏差行為探究〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-1202201400054900

延伸閱讀