透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.93.221
  • 學位論文

大一學生微積分學習策略與微積分學習成效之研究

A Study of Calculus Learning Strategies and Calculus Achievement of Freshmen at University

指導教授 : 白啟光

摘要


本研究旨在了解國立交通大學的大一學生之微積分學習策略運用情形,及其在個人背景變項上的差異情形,並針對微積分學習策略與微積分學習成效的相關狀況進行分析。 本研究採用問卷調查法,以「微積分學習策略量表」為研究工具,以國立交通大學大一微積分學生為研究對象,共發出952 份問卷,經剔除無效問卷後,得有效問卷626份,可用率達74.5%;在微積分學習成效的部分,則以其100學年度第一學期之期末會考成績為計算依據。本研究採描述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、二因子變異數分析、相關性檢定進行統計分析。 本研究之主要發現如下: 一、大一學生的微積分學習策略以「學科價值」、「尋求幫助」、「先備知識」表現最佳; 以「焦慮」、「自我管理」、「了解題意」表現最差。 二、個人背景變項在微積分學習策略上有顯著差異。 三、個人背景變項在微積分學習成效上有顯著差異。 四、個人背景變項與微積分學習成效在微積分學習策略上有交互作用。 五、微積分學習策略與微積分學習成效有顯著正相關。 六、大學入學考試數學分數與微積分學習成效有顯著正相關。 本研究最後根據研究結果,提出各項建議,供學生、教學者及未來研究之參考。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to explore the calculus learning strategies of freshmen at university, the diversity of background variables, and the relation between calculus learning strategies and calculus achievement. The implement of calculus learning strategies was the questionnaire edited by myself. The sample was 952, eliminated the invalidation, the validation was 626, so the available sample was 74.5%. The calculus achievement was the final examination of the 1st semester of the academic year 2011. The statistical methods used to analyze the data were Descriptive Statistics, t-test, One-way ANOVA, Two-way ANOVA, Correlation. The major findings are followings: (1) The best calculus learning strategies were “worth of subject”, “finding help”, and “prior knowledge”. The worst calculus learning strategies were “anxiety” , “self-superintendence”, and “problem understanding”. (2) The background variables had a significant impact on calculus learning strategies. (3) The background variables had a significant impact on calculus achievement. (4) There were interaction effects between the background variables and calculus achievement concerning calculus learning strategies. (5) There were positively connected between calculus learning strategies and calculus achievement. (6) There were positively connected between the mathematics achievement of entrance examination of university and calculus achievement. Finally, some suggestions for students , educators, and future research were proposed according to the results.

參考文獻


丁慕玉(2008)。「暑修微積分學生之背景與學業成就的探討」。虎尾科技大學學報,27(4),65-74。
白啟光(2005)。使用CAS 之微積分實驗教學之成效研究。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告。
洪寶蓮(1990)。大學生學習與讀書策略量表之修訂及調查研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
郭郁智(2000)。國民中學學生學習策略、批判思考能力與學業成就之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
葉秋呈(2007)。以模糊理論建構微積分學習之異同分析。測驗學刊,54(1),175-196。

被引用紀錄


曾釋嫻(2014)。翻轉課堂教學對大學生學習策略影響之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2014.01080
李婉儀(2014)。科技大學四年制日間部不同入學管道學生學習表現之個案研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0006-2601201410061500

延伸閱讀