產業環保法規申報相關之層級分析

Evaluate The Environment Legislation Declaration in Industry Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

賴璿瑜(Chzu-Yu Lai)

指導教授 ： 白子易

朝陽科技大學/理工學院/環境工程與管理系/碩士(2009年)

摘要

企業若要達成永續經營必須需兼顧環境保護、經濟成長及社會福祉。在環境保護上企業的責任除了做好防治污染、增設處理空水廢毒設備等環境成本外，法規下的要求申報相關紀錄亦是企業的義務之ㄧ。產業透過環保申報了解自我的製程之產廢污染，環保單位透過環保申報有效掌控污染，故申報重要性不可言喻，亦是本文探討之重點。 本研究主要以AHP層級分析方法針對我國產業對於現況環保法規申報相關要因作探討，首先做文獻探討，內容包括近代環境保護意識的源起與各國法制的動向，國內環保法規的沿革、制定。將環境問題解決制度分成組織面、規範面、手段面切入，以及在環保事件爭議與救濟，環保申報系統的架構與方式、網路申報介面等做探討，藉由以上文獻探討找出我國產業環保法規申報的相關要因，並運用層級分析方法設計問卷計算分析，選定相關學者採問卷與當面訪談之方式，以探討出該等要因在相關學者心目中的優先排序與審慎分析原由。本研究所得結論論述如下： 我國產業環保法規申報，第一層級（目的層）評估指標中，其重要性順序為：『行政管理』（0.307），『申報介面』（0.306），『廠商操作』（0.233），『社會環境』（0.155）。而依各項評估指標之綜合權重（絕對權重）分析可知：最重要的指標為「積極辦理宣導研習教育並專人推廣」（0.121），第二為「申報規劃整體統籌上要周全」（0.092），第三為「介面入門操作容易簡單明確」（0.090）、第四為「加強人員素質並參與環保訓練」（0.089）。

關鍵字

環保申報 ； 層級分析方法 ； 申報介面 ； 環保法規

並列摘要

Industry which want to reach sustainable manage have to give consideration to environmental protection、economic growth and social welfare. The responsibility of industry except to add cost in preventing pollution and establishing equipment,anothor one duty of industry in environmental protection is the relation report record requisted by legislation.Industry rely on environment legislation declaration to comprehend himself the manufacture process to discard. The environment government organization rely on environment legislation declaration to control pollution efficiently.Above all,the environment legislation declaration is much significance,which also the role of this thesis.
The research using analytic hierarchy process(AHP) treats of the effect in environment legislation declaration of industry in a recent period.The first,conferring bibliography,the contents include the origin consciousness of environmental protection in modern time and the trend of international legal institution.The past history and establishment of internal environment legislation. The environmental problem solution system is divided in organization face、standard face and method face.And we discuss environmental occurrence dispute and relief、the framework and form of environment legislation declaration system and the network declaration interface. We try to find factors rely on conferring bibliography and design some questionnaire with the AHP level law directed to the relation factors and personal review. This information will be inputted and analyzed by Excel after the interview and so they can find out the decision and the course. We get a conclusion from this research as follow:
In the first level appraisal target of our industry environment legislation declaration there are four components placed as follow: administrative management 0.307,declaration interface 0.306, manufacturers operating 0.233 and social environment 0.155.We can know all level appraisal target in absolute goal priority analyzation,the frist target is to attend to make know and education constructive and popularization （0.121）.The second target is the whole plan in declaration need complete and perfect（0.092） The third target is the introductory in declaration interface to operate with east and categorical（0.090）. The fourth target is to strengthen personnel quality and participate environment study（0.089）.

並列關鍵字

environment legislation ； declaration ； analytic hierarchy process ； environment declaration

參考文獻

Saaty, Thomas L.（1980）, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York :

Ahmed, N. U., Montagno, R. V., and Firenze, R. J., “Organizational performance and environmental consciousness׃ an empirical study”, Management Decision, pp.57-62(1998).

Anex , R. P., and Englehardt, J. D., “Application of a predictive Bayesian model to environmental accounting”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 82, pp.99–112(2001).

Frischknecht, R., Braunschweig, A., Hofstetter, P., and Suter, P., “Human health damages due to ionizing radiation in life cycle impact assessment”, Environmental mpact Assessment Review, Vol. 20, pp.159-189(2000).

Lundin, M., and Morrison, G. M., “A life cycle assessment based procedure for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems”, Urban Water, Vol. 4, pp.145-152(2002).