本研究旨在探討國小教師休閒活動類型與參與動機之情形。以「屏東縣國小教師休閒活動調查問卷」為研究工具,了解屏東縣國小教師休閒活動參與現況及參與動機是否因不同背景變項有所差異,並探討不同休閒類型與休閒動機之關係。 本研究是以屏東縣國小教師為研究對象,採分層隨機抽樣,共抽取500人進行問卷調查,得有效問卷473份。以描述性統計、獨立樣本T考驗、單因子變異數分析、雪費事後比較法和Pearson 積差相關分析進行資料分析,結果發現: 一、在休閒活動類型的參與情形,以娛樂性的頻率最高,依序是知識性、社交性、體育性、戶外遊憩性,從事技藝/嗜好性最低。 二、國小教師參與休閒動機甚高,並以「健康適能」「情境需求」「社會需求」為其主要動機。 三、不同性別、年齡、學歷、職務、婚姻狀況、居住地區國小教師在休閒參與類型上有顯著差異。男性、未婚居住平原者在社交性,男性、碩士在知識性,女性在戶外遊憩性、體育性,30歲以下在社交性參與較高。 四、不同性別、學校規模、居住地區國小教師在休閒動機上有顯著差異。男性在社會需求、情境需求,12班以下在刺激避免,居住親山地區在成就需求、社會需求、刺激避免因素上明顯較高。 五、休閒動機因素構面與休閒活動類型除了知識性、技藝/嗜好性、娛樂性分別與刺激避免無顯著相關外,餘皆具有顯著正相關。
This study attempts to explore the leisure activity types and participative motivation of elementary school teachers. The research instrument “Pingtung County Elementary School Teacher’s Leisure Activities Questionnaire” was implemented for the purpose of investigating whether background variables caused diversity in leisure activities, participation and participative motivation of elementary school teachers, while exploring the relationship between different leisure activities. The research subjects were elementary school teachers from Pingtung County - and the survey was conducted using the stratified random sampling method. 500 Questionnaires were distributed and 473 valid questionnaires where collected and analyzed, using descriptive statistics, independent sample T-tests, one-way ANOVA, Scheffe’s method and Pearson’s product-moment correlation methods. The data analysis yielded the following outcomes: 1.In the order of preference concerning the types of leisure activities, amusement was the most preferred activity type, followed by intellectual activity; social activity; athletic activity; hobbies and technical activity. 2.With regards to participative motivation of leisure activities, the enhancement of physical fitness was the top priority, followed by social demands; situational demands; stimulus avoidance and achievement demands. 3.Significant differences exist in leisure motivation of elementary school teachers when the following background variables differ: (1) Gender: Significant differences were noted in social end situation demand factors - especially where males are concerned. (2) School size: The stimulus avoidance item shows significant differences between schools of varying sizes - especially where classes of 12 students are concerned, compared to classes of 25 students. (3) Residential region: Significant differences in relation to achievement demands, social demands and stimulus avoidance factors emerged between teachers hailing from different residential areas/regions. Respondents from the more mountainous areas displayed marked differences to those from coastal or other water-accessible areas. 4.The leisure motivation factor dimension is in positive correlation to leisure activity types. This indicates that the influences observed with the alteration of any given dimension will also bring forth the same level of influence when other dimensions are altered.