本研究旨在透過深度訪談與問卷調查的方式,探討在教師眼中,互動式電子白板(Interactive Whiteboard,IWB)在國民中學推動及教學的狀況下,對學生學習動機與學習成效之影響。透過訪談台中市立育英國中19位三年級學科教師,並對台中市立育英國中全體三年級學生進行問卷測驗,探討互動式電子白板教學在國中各學科應用上之適切性、互動式電子白板融入國中各學科教學後,學生學習動機與學習成效之改變情形、互動式電子白板應用於教學上,是否有哪些可再加強之處,最後提出對國民中學資訊教育之建議。 本研究之研究對象為台中市立育英國中三年級學生共283 人,研究之結果如下: 1. 互動式電子白板應用於國中學科教學是適切的。 2. 互動式電子白板融入國中各學科教學後,學生學習動機有向上提昇之情形。 3. 互動式電子白板融入國中各學科教學後,學生學習成效並無明顯變化。 對於互動式電子白板融入國中各學科教學後,學生學習動機有向上提昇,但學生學習成效並無明顯變化之情形,提出以下看法: 1. 學生努力程度不足 2. 學生選擇性學習 3. 缺乏立即性回饋設備
This study aims depth interviews and questionnaire surveys to explore the interactive whiteboard in the promotion and the teaching of junior high school situations, students learning motivation and learning effectiveness.Through interviewing with the nineteen subject teachers of the third grade and the whole third grade students in a questionnaire testing of Yu-Ying junior high school in Taichung City explores interactive whiteboard in teaching various subjects in the junior high, the appropriateness of applications, interactive whiteboard applications in various subjects teaching, students learning motivation and the change of learning effectiveness in circumstances, and what can be reinforced in interactive whiteboard for teaching and presenting proposals for the junior high information education. The objects of this study are the students in the Yu-Ying junior high school in Taichung City, a total of 283 third year students, which the research results are as follows: First, the interactive whiteboard used in teaching junior high is appropriate. Second, the interactive whiteboard applies in various subjects of teaching in junior high, students’ learning motivation is elevated. Third, the interactive whiteboard applies in various subjects of teaching in junior high, students’ learning effectiveness did not change significantly. Fourth, the interactive whiteboard applies in various subjects of teaching, students’ learning motivation upward, but students’ learning effectiveness did not change significantly, make the following observations: 1. Students did not study hard enough. 2. Students learned what they wanted to learn. 3. The lack of the immediate feedback device