透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.171.235
  • 期刊

國民中學綜合活動學習領域活動課程設計:以探索教育活動為例

Adventure Education: A Curriculum Design for Middle School Integrated Activities Field Programs

摘要


本研究之目的在於研究並設計能應用於國民中學綜合活動學習領域的探索教育活動課程。作者認為如果能於國民中學綜合活動學習領域實施探索教育活動課程將有助於學生認知、情意、體能與社交等能力的發展。 本研究將探索教育活動課程分為六個層次,分別為:第一層次:探索教育介紹、熱身遊戲與破冰遊戲;第二層次:於學校進行之解決問題活動;第三層次:信任活動;第四層次:於繩索場進行之問題解決活動;第五層次:低空繩索活動;第六層次:高空繩索活動。作者進一步將六個活動層次分為兩大部份,原因在於教師在進行第二部份:四、五、六層次的探索教育活動,須具備更進階的引導能力與相關設備與場地。依目前國中的學期週數扣掉全校性活動,以每層次十五週來規劃,可完整實施一個學期,全部六個層次則可以三年時程來規劃完整實施。 目前雖然有許多文獻證明探索教育有助於學生身心發展與社交能力,也有許多學校實施探索教育活動。然而,卻很少有學校能針對探索教育活動進行完整與適當的課程設計與規劃。改善的唯一方法或許就是要針對國民中學綜合活動學習領域的探索教育活動課程設計加以探討,並與學校教師合作實施。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to research and design lesson plans for adventure education, which will serve as a curriculum for instructors who are responsible for the integrated activities field in middle school level. It was felt that such a program, if included in the integrated activities field, would constitute a valuable contribution to the intellectual, psychological, physiological, and social development of the students. The lesson plans of adventure education was divided into six levels, which were 1) games, 2) group initiatives not on the ropes course, 3) trust activities, 4) group initiatives on the ropes course, 5) low ropes course, and 6) high ropes course. In addition, these six levels were divided into section1 and section2. Section 1 included levels 1, 2, and 3. Section2 included levels 4, 5, and 6. A necessary distinction was made between section 1 and section 2 due to the demand of instructor expertise in adventure education and the need for appropriate facilities in section2. In conclusion, research has been conducted regarding the physical, social, emotional, and psychological benefits of adventure education. Adventure education also has been included in activities programs in many schools. However, comprehensive and appropriate lesson plans of adventure education continue to be absent from many middle school curricula. Perhaps, the only way to change this tendency is to study the curriculum design of adventure education and to cooperate with the instructors in middle schools for the fulfillment of the lessons plans.

參考文獻


李坤崇(2003)。綜合活動學習領域概論。台北:心理出版社。
李義男(2003)。探索教育與諮商治療。台北:水牛出版社。
許春金(1996)。犯罪學。台北:三民。
教育部(2003)。綜合活動學習領域課程綱要
蔡居澤(1995)。探索教育與心療活動之探討。公民訓育學報。4,409-432。

被引用紀錄


林怡禎(2013)。影響非營利組織服務滿意度之探討⎯以三育青少年假日訓練學校為個案〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2013.00017
蔣世寶(2023)。大專班級組織成員對於課程活動之參與態度研究-以視覺傳達設計專業為例教育研究與實踐學刊70(1),49-76。https://doi.org/10.6701/JEPR.202306_70(1).0003
Chen, Y. C., & Hung, W. L. (2017). Application of Concept Advanced Interpretive Structural Modeling to Evaluating Learning Effectiveness in Adventure Education. 課程與教學, 20(3), 165-191. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201707_20(3).0007
王國運(2015)。探索教育課程融入高中職學生校外教學對生活效能及團隊凝聚力的影響〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2015.00171
陳修蕙(2010)。繩索挑戰課程對高關懷青少年之影響研究〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2010.00159

延伸閱讀