透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.135.217.228
  • 期刊

大學教育目標與學生事務專業發展引導原則研究-大學學務主管與其他主管及導師觀點之分析

The Research of College Education Goals and Guiding Principles on ProfessionalDevelopment of Student Affairs-Based on the Point of Views of Academic and Student Affairs Administrators

摘要


本研究旨在探討與比較不同類型大學學務處、教務處、學術主管及導師,對於大學教育目標與學生事務專業發展引導原則的觀點。研究方法為問卷調查,研究對象為分層隨機叢集取樣79所大學校院相關人員,回收有效問卷1,565份。研究結果包括:一、臺灣學生事務發展經歷威權管理、摸索轉型、專業萌芽三大階段,並由管理逐步邁向重視整體行政效能。二、大學相關人員(含學務處主管、教務處主管、學術主管及導師),對於大學教育目標重視的程度,依序為「學術專業與能力」、「個人發展」、「公民素養」。三、不同類型學校相關人員對大學教育目標與學生事務引導原則的重視程度不同。(一)私立普通大學對於大學教育目標與學生事務引導原則的重視程度最高。(二)公立普通大學對學生持正向觀點,但較少關注個別學生的輔導。(三)私立技職校院在大學教育目標與學生事務引導原則上,重視程度較其他類型學校低。(四)大學教務處主管、學務處主管、學術主管及導師,均將「學術專業與能力」視為最重要的大學教育目標。(五)教務處主管和學務處主管擁有較多提供學生服務和促進學生學習等較為積極的觀點。本研究綜合發現,提出提升大學學生事務專業發展與進一步研究的建議。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to explore and compare viewpoints on university educational goals and student affairs professional development guidance principles as expressed by administrators of student affairs, academic affairs, pedagogical affairs and tutors of various types of universities. A questionnaire interview was conducted through stratified random sampling of 79 colleges and universities. A total of 1,565 valid questionnaires were received. Findings in this study include:1. Taiwan's student affairs development has gone through three stages: authoritarian management, transition and professional growth. Management methods were adopted to gradually put more emphasis on overall administrative efficiency2. University personnel (including supervisors of student affairs, academic affairs, pedagogical affairs and tutors) place a degree of emphasis on university study goals in the following order: ”academic specialties and capabilities,” ”individual development” and ”citizen's qualities”.3. Administrators of different university types emphasize different goals in university education and students affairs guiding principles.(1) Ordinary private universities place the highest degree of emphasis on university education and students affairs guidance principles.(2) Ordinary public universities have positive views on students but rarely pay attention to individual student guidance.(3) Private technical colleges emphasize university education and students affairs guidance principles less than other school types.(4) Administrators of student affairs, academic affairs, pedagogical affairs and tutors in universities all view ”academic specialties and capabilities” as the most important university education goal.(5) Administrators of pedagogical and student affairs show more active attitudes to providing services to students and promoting better learning.Finally, recommendations for the professional development and efficiency of student affairs and for the further researches are provided.

參考文獻


宋玫玫()。
吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析。台北市:五南。
邱皓政(2002)。量化研究興統計分析-SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北市:五南。
教育部訓育委員會()。,未出版。
梁朝雲()。

被引用紀錄


蔡昕璋(2020)。2010年代臺灣學生事務的社會脈動與相關研究分析學生事務與輔導58(4),13-32。https://doi.org/10.6506/SAGC.202003_58(4).0003
蔡志賢(2012)。高等教育課外學習核心能力及其評量指標建構研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315292274

延伸閱讀