少年重複被害因素之研究

A Study of Juvenile Repeated Victimization (JRV)

陳淑娥(Shu-Er Chen) ； 鄭瑞隆(Jui-Lung Cheng)

《犯罪學期刊》 11卷2期 (2008/12) Pp. 93-121

https://doi.org/10.29607/ZHWHGX.200812.0004

摘要

本研究以1,004名國中和高中職學生爲研究對象進行調查研究，探討影響少年重複被害的因素，並檢驗各預測變項對少年重複被害的解釋力。主要研究結果如下： 一、男性少年被害率及重複被害率均明顯高於女性少年；父母分居、離婚或父母一方已再婚的少年，被害率及重複被害率也比較高。 二、重複被害少年比單次被害或無被害經驗少年，有較高比例的生活方式危險因子、行爲危險因子、過去被害經驗及暴露於犯罪情境；較低程度的防護監控；重複被害少年刺激尋求度較高，也較傾向於具有負面的自我概念。 三、過去被害經驗、行爲危險因子、尋求刺激的個人特質及暴露於犯罪情境等四個變項，可共同預測少年重複被害，且具有33.1%的解釋力；其中以過去被害經驗最具預測力(Beta=.414)。 根據研究發現與結論，本研究分別對教育主管機關、家庭及學校提出預防少年重複被害之建議。

關鍵字

少年 ； 被害 ； 少年重複被害

並列摘要

The primary purpose of the study is to investigate the causes that lead to juvenile repeated victimization (JRV). One thousand and four adolescents from junior and senior high schools were surveyed. Several factors were examined to explain why the subjects had encountered the fate. The research findings are as belows.
1. Male adolescents are more likely than female ones to suffering from victimization as well as RV. Those boys and girls with divorved or separated parents have higher rate of victimization and RV.
2. Repeatly victimized juveniles (RVJ) have higher rate of dangerous life style, dangerous behaviors, past victimization experience, and exposure to criminal situations, than the adolescents without victimization experience or with single-time victimization experience. RVJ have lower rate of protective guide and control. They have lower self concept, but more likely to seek for stimulus or dangerous activities.
3. Past experience of victimization, dangerous behaviors, stimuli-seeking, and exposure to criminal situations in total can explain JRV by 33.1%. Among them, past experience of victimization is found to be the most powerful predictor of JRV (Beta=.414).
Based on the research findings, the researchers propose some recommendations to educational authorities, school administration, and family for the prrevention of JRV.

並列關鍵字

Juvenile ； Victimization ； Juvenile Repeated Victimization JRV

參考文獻

江淑如(1989)。少年恐嚇被害之研究－「生活方式－暴露」理論之驗證。私立東吳大學社會學研究所。

周愫嫻、侯崇文(2000)。青少年被害影響因素的探討。犯罪學期刊。5，79-106。

侯崇文、黃啓賓(2002)。由校園環境探討學生偏差行爲之發生與被害經驗。中央警察大學警學叢刊。32(5)，145-176。

張平吾(1990)。從被害者學觀點探討少年恐嚇被害者生活特性與被害傾向之研究。臺北市:五南。

陳祖輝(2003)。國中校園被害經驗研究學生觀點的回顧。校園點燈。42(4)，67-72。