透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.135.202
  • 期刊

跆拳道選手與大專生深度知覺之比較:絕對及相對辨識的距離誤差

Comparison of Depth Perception between Taekwondo Contestants and College Students: Absolute and Relative Discrimination on Distance Error

摘要


Purpose: Compare the depth perception (absolute and relative discrimination of distance error) between taekwondo contestants and colleges students. Method: Fifteen male subjects from Group-A taekwondo contestants of National Taiwan Sport University and another 15 male college students from different university were recruited respectively. The measurement of absolute and relative discrimination of distance (4, 1.5 and 1 meter) error was modified based on Melcher and Lund's (1992) method. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used and the significance level (α) was 0.05. Results: Three ways repeated measures ANOVA reveals that only 2 way interaction between group and distance (F (2, 56)=8.65, partial eta square=0.24, p=.001), and the main effect of absolute vs. relative discrimination (F (1, 28)=78.47, partial eta square=0.74, p=.000) reached statistically significant. Regardless of the group (taekwondo contestants vs. college students), distance (4, 1.5, 1 meter), the error of depth discrimination was significantly smaller in relative distance (8.16±7.02cm) than that in absolute distance (20.52±12.47cm) (p<.0001). Regardless absolute or relative distance, group-A taekwondo contestants showed significant smaller depth discrimination at 4 meters (11.47±7.22cm) than college students (20.52±12.47cm) did (p<.0001). However, there was no significant difference in depth discrimination at 1 meter and 1.5 meters between Group-A taekwondo contestants and college students (p>.05). Conclusion: Group-A taekwondo contestants had better depth discrimination at 4 meters than college students did. Our results provide the direction for coaches and researchers of Taekwondo to design and plan their training program using the parameters of depth discrimination in the future.

並列摘要


Purpose: Compare the depth perception (absolute and relative discrimination of distance error) between taekwondo contestants and colleges students. Method: Fifteen male subjects from Group-A taekwondo contestants of National Taiwan Sport University and another 15 male college students from different university were recruited respectively. The measurement of absolute and relative discrimination of distance (4, 1.5 and 1 meter) error was modified based on Melcher and Lund's (1992) method. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used and the significance level (α) was 0.05. Results: Three ways repeated measures ANOVA reveals that only 2 way interaction between group and distance (F (2, 56)=8.65, partial eta square=0.24, p=.001), and the main effect of absolute vs. relative discrimination (F (1, 28)=78.47, partial eta square=0.74, p=.000) reached statistically significant. Regardless of the group (taekwondo contestants vs. college students), distance (4, 1.5, 1 meter), the error of depth discrimination was significantly smaller in relative distance (8.16±7.02cm) than that in absolute distance (20.52±12.47cm) (p<.0001). Regardless absolute or relative distance, group-A taekwondo contestants showed significant smaller depth discrimination at 4 meters (11.47±7.22cm) than college students (20.52±12.47cm) did (p<.0001). However, there was no significant difference in depth discrimination at 1 meter and 1.5 meters between Group-A taekwondo contestants and college students (p>.05). Conclusion: Group-A taekwondo contestants had better depth discrimination at 4 meters than college students did. Our results provide the direction for coaches and researchers of Taekwondo to design and plan their training program using the parameters of depth discrimination in the future.

參考文獻


孟慶茂、常建華(2000)。心理學實驗。台北:心理。
林明聲(1999)。運動視覺訓練法。台南:信宏出版社。
張春興(1995)。現代心理學。台北:東華。
陳俊汕(2005)。運動視覺與選擇性注意的機轉及其在運動上的應用。大專體育。78,200-209。
彭譯箴、李雲光(2005)。籃球選手與大專生深度知覺之比較研究。北體學報。13,88-95。

被引用紀錄


陳昱仁、寧玉麟、史麗珠、張世聰、劉妍秀(2019)。6週空手道訓練對10-11歲孩童深度知覺與周邊視覺之成效運動教練科學(55),21-30。https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.201909_(55).0003

延伸閱讀