透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.21.104.109
  • 期刊

當代法學的女性主義運動:一個法哲學史的分析

The Contemporary Feminist Movement of Jurisprudence: A Historical Analysis of Philosophy of Law

摘要


女性主義法學是當代法學的一種人文運動,她的特色包括解構和去中心化的思維、研究取向,以及對中義和人性化的社會抱持不變的期待和信心。本文從法哲學的角度,探討女性主義法學運動在當代發生的背景,並分析她的主要論述內容,包括她對傳統自由主義和人文主義的反省和批判,以及她對法學基礎研究帶來的衝擊和貢獻。直到今天,女性主義运動已經歷經二個階段的轉折,而邁入了第三個階段的發展,維繫女性主義運動的性別論述,大致可以回溯到一九四九年代,法國思想家西蒙波娃(Simone de Beauvoir 1908-86)出l版《第二性》(Le Deuxième Sexe)開始,女性主義運動由此進入一個新的時期,她結合社會抗爭和運動潮流中逐漸壯大的性別意識,開始制伸入學院論述,揭開一波又一波女性主義論述發展的序幕。經過第一階段的女權運動,大約一九七○年代以後,女性主義和法學結合,女性主義法學開始萌芽。本文以此為重點,說明、分析了過去三十多年問,當代法學的女性主義運動他三個主要論述方向,藉此勾勒女性主義法學發展的面貌,包括她與當代其他思潮,如自由主義、基進主義、情慾主義、酷兒理論、性別表意理論、精神分析、女性主義倫理學、法律與文學運動等結合、互動創造出的各種新的論述,以為深入了解她們的限制和可能性,提供一個分析的角度和基礎。

並列摘要


The feminist movement of jurisprudence has originated from the second wave of the feminist movement since 1970s. Its struggle for gender and sex equality within legal institutions as well as throughout social and cultural ideologies is not an overarching theoretical approach, hut a collection of themes, ideas and arguments. Nonetheless the different legal feminisms have concerned with the gendered discourses in the jurisprudence and ongoing projects of legal reforms. They can be traced back to the date as the famous French feminist Simone de Beauvoir published her Le Deuxième Sexe in 1949. when the world women movement attended its new age: It was no longer a ”mere” powerful social movement but has become one important participant in academic, theoretical discourses. This paper will provide a historical analysis of the contemporary feminisms of jurisprudence from the perspective of philosophy of law, focusing upon reconstruction of their development and impact on legal reforms and theories. It seeks to convince scholars and activists of political and legal reforms, especially those who are interested in the debates of gender and justice, of the importance of a historical, contextual understanding of the particular feminist arguments. What is offered here is no more than a first attempt to draw together important and common themes of the legal feminisms, as articulated in past and present debates. In doing so, it will engender a deeper understanding both of the limitations and implications of legal feminisms as part of our modern and postmodern heritage, and the new art of creative reasoning.

並列關鍵字

sexuality gender sex equality deconstruction decentering feminism legal feminism liberalism radicalism

參考文獻


顧燕翎、鄭至慧(1999)。女性主義經典。台北:
顧燕翎、林芳玫、黃淑玲、鄭至慧(1996)。女性主義理論與流派。台北:
性/別研究(1998)。性工作:妓權觀點。中壢:中央大學英文系性/別研究室。
性/別研究()。
張小虹(1996)。女性主義理論與流派。台北:女書。

被引用紀錄


蘇芳儀(2014)。我國性交易管制: 從女性主義與實證研究評析社會秩序維護法〔碩士論文,國立交通大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6842/NCTU.2014.00049
金孟華(2010)。從女性主義法學觀察性侵害法律改革之演進〔碩士論文,國立交通大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6842/NCTU.2010.00407
歐蕙甄(2011)。性自主不自由?——論妨害性自主罪與普通妨害自由罪的差別〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.02213
李駿逸(2007)。論「性」之刑事法規制—以語言、權力、系統等差異理論作觀察—〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2007.00651
林志鍵(2006)。性自主?性桎梏?─我國刑法性自主犯罪之分析與批判〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2006.01000

延伸閱讀