本研究探討以國內大專院校男子排球比賽教練在替補應用表現與成效之研究。以100學年度大專排球聯賽公開一級預賽男生A組與B組的十二支隊伍為研究對象,將資料以描敘述性統計呈現不同替補球員類型與不同替補時機及卡方檢定進行不同類型、時機與成效之差異比較。結果顯示替補發球(32.65%)與攻擊(27.04%)等類型的應用顯著多於替補防守(21.94%)與舉球(18.37%);在小幅落後(35.7%)與小幅領先(23.5%),應用替補顯著多於其他替補時機;在不同替補類型對替補成效得分方面,應用百分比整體成效上達顯著差異(p<.05),在替補得分方面:替補防守的百分比(32.5%)顯著高於其它三類。不同替補時機對替補成效得分方面應用百分比的整體差異未達顯著差異(p>.05)表示不同時機替補在替補成效得分方面應用百分比沒有顯著差異。建議球隊處於小幅落後及小幅領先時,可視比賽狀況運用替補,同時球隊處於小幅領先或小幅落後時教練可考量將防守與攻擊較佳的球員替補上場藉以提升球隊得分能力。
The purpose of this study was to domestic universities and colleges men's volleyball game coach in the performance and effectiveness of research. In 2012 college volleyball league open a preliminaries boys in group A and group B of 12 teams for the study, the recorded data to describe the descriptive statistics showing the different bench types and different replacement timing of the situation and the chi-square test for different types of differences in the timing and effectiveness of comparison. The results show that the type of application of the replacement ball (32.65%) and attacks (27.04%) significantly more than the substitute defense (21.94%) and held the ball (18.37%); slightly behind (35.7%) and slightly ahead (23.5%), replacement application situation significantly more than the other bench time; significant differences (p<.05) on a different bench types of replacement effectiveness score, the application of the percentage of the overall effectiveness of high bench score: substitute defensive percentage (32.5%) significantly in the other three categories. Different replacement timing of replacement effectiveness score percentage of the overall difference was not significant difference (p>.05) the different time substitute bench effectiveness score percentage not significantly different. Slightly backward and slightly ahead, video game situation the use of replacement is recommended when the team is, when the team is in slightly ahead or slightly backward coach can consider the defense and attack better player off the bench in order to enhance the team scoring ability.