透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.217.60.35
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

Information and Ideological Structure in Spatial Voting

並列摘要


This article aims at unifying the theory of spatial voting and the theory that is variously called conceptualization, information, or sophistication. Following Downs's early insights on uncertainty as well as recent developments in both literatures, I argue that it is of critical importance that spatial voting models explicitly incorporate information effects. For this purpose, I develop a heteroskedastic probit model that allows for the specification of information heterogeneity. This model is applied to the Taiwan Election and Democratization Study's 2004 post-presidential election survey data. In 2004, Taiwan’s political landscape was dominantly defined by the Green vs. Blue ideological cleavage, and the candidates were perceived as taking divergent positions. This article investigates the effects of information and activism on the spatial structure and their implications on candidates' strategies. My findings confirm the existence of these effects on voter uncertainty in the framework of spatial analysis.

參考文獻


Apter, David(ed.)(1964).Ideology and Discontent.New York:Basic Books.
Downs, Anthony(1957).An Economic Theory of Democracy.New York:Harper & Row.
Lin, Tse-min,Enelow, James M.,Dorussen, Han(1999).Equilibrium in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial Voting.Public Choice.98(1-2),59-82.
Lin, Tse-min,Chu, Yun-han(2008).The Structure of Taiwan's Political Cleavages toward the 2004 Presidential Election: A Spatial Analysis.Taiwan Journal of Democracy.4(2),133-154.
Nie, Norman H.,Verba, Sidney,Patrocik, John R.(1976).The Changing American Voter.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.

被引用紀錄


劉昶志(2010)。位置隱私權上的新混合式隱匿系統〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2010.00122

延伸閱讀