本研究旨在利用多準則決策的方法協助臺灣職棒球隊了解自身的優缺點,進而透過所得之資訊擬定補強策略。為考慮評估的複雜性與多準則決策之特性,本研究應用層級分析法求取職棒不同任務之投手與野手評估準則之權重,並搭配灰關聯分析法進行各隊不同任務投手與野手排序之實證分析,利用中華職棒大聯盟2011年例行賽資料進行球隊補強資訊之驗證。研究結果顯示在職棒投手與野手各項準則權重會依照任務不同而有所差異。在中華職棒大盟所屬球隊不同任務之球員排序,研究發現除了興農整體表現較差外,其餘統一、Lamingo與兄弟三隊各有所長。本研究結論:本文所提之模式能有效提供客觀且可操作的程序予職棒球隊進行補強資訊分析的依據。
Using the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method, this study analyzed the strength and weakness of professional baseball teams in the Chinese Professional Baseball League (CPBL) of Taiwan. With the complexity of evaluation and the characteristics of MCDM in mind, analysis hierarchy process (AHP) was used to obtain the weight of evaluation criteria for pitchers and fielders of each team. Then, Grey relational analysis was applied to assess the ranking of these players, by adopting the actual data from the 2011 CPBL season. Results showed the significant differences in weight of the evaluation criteria for the pitchers and fielders, due to differences in their roles. Their ranking in CPBL showed that the overall performance of Sinon Bulls was relatively weaker than the other teams, as Uni-President 7-Eleven Lions, Lamigo Monkeys and Brother Elephants have their own unique strengths. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the application of AHP and Grey relational analyses to evaluate the strength of professional baseball teams more objectively, which can help to construct the appropriate strategies to strengthen their performance.