社區大學促進公共參與的校務經營模式研究

A Study of Public Participation Promoting Management Models of Community Universities

李橙安(Chen-An Lee)

指導教授 ： 何青蓉

國立高雄師範大學/教育學院/成人教育研究所/碩士(2013年)

https://doi.org/10.6817/NKNU.2013.00022

摘要

社大的蓬勃發展，已成為臺灣推動社會改革重要的一股力量，其理念主要透過終身學習來推動社會改革，因此，社區大學校務發展與公共參與間有著密不可分的關係。為解兩者間彼此的關係，以及不同社大在促進公共參與上的校務經營模式為何和包括不同模式間的差異，本研究採用質性研究以及訪談法，以通過社團法人社區大學全國促進會辦理之「學校經營與公共參與」認證之三所社大為研究對象
，就校務經營，在組織發展上可分為「專業分工型」、「意識啟蒙型」和「NPO策略聯盟型」三種社大，其促進公共參與策略有「行政人員培力」、「課程與教學輔導」、「學員及社團輔導」、「辦理綜合活動」、「推動社區營造」、「策略聯盟」等多種促進公共參與策略。
「專業分工型社大」因能運用之資源較為豐沛，所以在內部組織分工上較為綿密，且能透過制度化、多元化之方式促進公共參與。「意識啟蒙型社大」雖整體資源較為短缺，但能著重共識凝聚、人才培力和由下而上，從民間參與力量培養起。「NPO策略聯盟型社大」能善用政府資源進行願景的落實，以及透過民間組織策略聯盟，針對公共議題進行倡議，此模式讓政府資源與公民參與的能量，在社會上齊頭並進。

關鍵字

社區大學 ； 校務經營 ； 公共參與

並列摘要

The rapid development of community universities has become an important driver of social reform in Taiwan. As one of the objectives of community universities is to promote social reform through lifelong learning, there is a close relationship between the management of community universities and public participation. The goal of this study is to clarify this relationship and further identify the school management model that promotes public participation as well as the differences between models. Based on a qualitative approach, this study analyzed data collected from interviews. The subjects we three community universities which have passed the certification of “school management and public participation” administered by National Association for the Promotion of Community Universities.In terms of organizational development, this study identified three types as follows: “the specialized type”, “the enlightening type”, and “the NPO allied type”, and the following public participation promoting strategies of community universities, including “administrative personnel empowerment”, “counseling on courses and teaching”, “counseling for students and clubs”, “organization of integrated activities”, “promotion of community empowerment”, and “formation of strategic alliances”.
In details,the “specialized type” of community universities is given more abundant resources, so it has a relatively a more elaborate division of labor and can promote public participation in more systematic and diversified manners. The “enlightening type” has access to fewer resources, but it focuses more on consensus building, human resources empowerment, and promotion of public participation from bottom up. The “NPO allied type” utilizes government resources to fulfill school visions and form strategic alliances with civil society organizations to initiate public issues.This model allows government resources and citizen participation efforts to work in parallel in the society. Finally, this study also proposes some suggestions for
Further　improvement　for the practices and research　of　the　community　universities.

並列關鍵字

community university ； school management ； public participation

參考文獻

李柏諭（2005）。公私協力與社區治理的理論與實務：我國社區大學與政府經驗。公共行政學報，16，62-79

范熾文（2006）學校經營與管理-概念、理論與實務。高雄：麗文文化事業股份有限公司

黃武雄（2002）。獨立思考與主體經驗─比較通識教育與社區大學的理念。通識教育季刊，2，251-272

蔡政宏(2006)論社區大學之「知識解放」如何可能？一個知識論原則的分析。教育與社會研究。10，31-64

蕭佳純（2003）。以公民社會角度論社區大學的發展。教育與社會研究，6，1-25