從共同作者之學科組合探討跨學科合作：以高分子學研究為例

A Study of Interdisciplinary Collaboration from the Perspective of Co-authorship: The Case of Polymer Science Research

張郁蔚(Yu-Wei Chang)

《圖書與資訊學刊》 78期 (2011/08) Pp. 42-62

https://doi.org/10.6575/JoLIS.2011.78.03

摘要

有鑑於共同作者之跨學科研究結果僅呈現共同作者的學科分佈情形，未探討哪些學科之研究人員傾向一起發表文獻。本研究目的在以10種高分子學期刊為研究對象，分析1979年、1989年、1999年及2009年之共同作者學科分佈及學科組合情形。研究結果確認學科組合方式能提供更詳細之跨學科合作資訊，顯示高分子學合著論文的作者機構分佈於38個學科，但高分子學機構的研究人員僅與22個其他學科機構的研究人員共同發表論文，而高達189種的學科組合中，僅23.81%的學科組合包含來自高分子學機構的研究人員，反映高分子學是跨學科色彩顯明的研究領域。

關鍵字

共同作者 ； 學科分佈 ； 學科組合 ； 跨學科合作 ； 高分子學

並列摘要

The interdisciplinary research on co-authorship has primarily focused on the distribution of disciplines, rarely taking into account specific disciplinary combinations of co-authorship. To address this research gap, this paper conducts a case study of publications related to the field of polymer science, specifically articles from 10 journals published in 1979, 1989, 1999, and 2009, to analyze the disciplinary distribution and disciplinary combinations of the field. The results confirm that the analysis of disciplinary combinations reveals more detailed information of interdisciplinary collaboration than what disciplinary distribution has provided. Among 38 disciplines contributing to research in polymer science, researchers of polymer science only collaborate with researchers across 22 disciplines. In addition, only 23.81% of 189 types of disciplinary combinations involve authors affiliated with institutes of polymer science, indicating that polymer science is a strong interdisciplinary field.

並列關鍵字

Co-authorship ； Disciplinary distribution ； Disciplinary combinations ； Interdisciplinary collaboration ； Polymer science

參考文獻

陳光華、梁瓊芳(2004)。臺灣圖書資訊學之跨學科交流。圖書資訊學刊。2(2)，31-55。

鶴田禎二、川上雄資、薛敬和編譯(2003)。高分子設計。新竹市:薛敬和。

Babchuk, N.,Keith, B.,Peters, G.(1999).Collaboration in sociology and other scientific disciplines: A comparative trendanalysis of scholarship in the social, physical, and mathematical sciences.The American Sociologist.30(3),5-21.

Beaver, D.,Rosen, R.(1978).Studies in scientific collaboration part I. the professional origins of scientific co-authorship.Scientometrics.1(1),65-84.

Choi, J. M.(1988).An analysis of authorship in anthropology journals, 1963 and 1983.Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian.6(3/4),85-94.