邂逅建構主義之後的遐思：「思考遊戲規則」的建構

Playing with Rules of "Thinking Game": Some Thoughts Inspired by Encountering Consturctivism

高敬文(James Ching-Ven Kau)

《課程與教學》 1卷3期 (1998/07) Pp. 97-110+140

https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.199807.0097

摘要

最近我有幾次與「建構主義」邂逅的因緣。整理因此邂逅而產生的覺察後發現，看見的省思焦點其實都與「『思考遊戲規則』的建構」有關。我試從幾個角度初採此一研究社群亟待正視的議題：（一）理論研究者著迷或耽溺「思考遊戲」的分辨；（二）擁抱流行時，感性與理性孰重（三）理論／實務業者的大和解。最後以「餘韻：『音樂花圈』的建構？」做結，略述我對「教育、「研究」等既定概念的鬆綁之淺見。

關鍵字

研究方法 ； 研究倫理

並列摘要

I was engaged to the discussion of constructivism several times, Recently, during recent discussions on constructivism, insinghts revealed a relation to the construction of rules of ”Thinking Game.””Thinking Game” seems to me one of the favorite games of intellectuals. The construction of rules for the game is an important issue that the research community must pay. I attempt to tackle the problem of constructing rules from 3 different angles.First, I urged the researchers to make a distinction between devotion to and indulgent with ”Thinking Game.” Second, I argued that both sensitivity and sensibility were indispensable for anyone who tried to embrace the educational fads. Finally, I suggested that the researchers and the practitioners work together to elevate the quality of schooling. In the last section of this paper, ”Coda: the construction of 'Music Garden'?”, I expressed my concern to subvert the established concepts of ”education” and 11 research. ”

並列關鍵字

Research Method ； Research Ethic