透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.135.183.89
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

憲政困局與國家認同-形似獨立的兩個糾結議題

The Conflict of National Identities and the Dilemma of Constitutional Reforms in Taiwan: Two Inseparable Independent Issues

摘要


近年來,憲法的意涵已由保障少數的自由民主主義,演化爲與舊政權決裂的宣示。而其合法性基礎,則建立於「人民主權」或「多數制憲」的概念。但對內部存在分歧的台灣社會,企圖透過多數進行憲改,卻引發了國家認同的疑慮,進而造成憲政實施的困局。有人因此認爲,唯有化解國家認同歧異,台灣才可能正常行憲。本文由美國的立憲經驗觀察,認爲行憲與認同其實可以同步達成。癥結在於:憲政的結構設計,是否能對分歧的少數提出充分的權益保障。但遺憾的是,當前的憲改方向,因過度強調多數意志,似乎反其道而行。

並列摘要


Most modern states have a document called ”constitution.” Writing a new constitution or revising an existing one is seen by many emerging democracies as an important gesture proclaiming their condemnation of the authoritarian and backward past. In order to separate from the past, these constitutions acquire legitimacy through popular support. Nevertheless, too much emphasis on popular support overlooks an important fact: that a constitution was originally developed to restrict political power, including the power wielded by the majority. Taiwan is a heterogeneous, even divided, society, yet it follows a similar approach in its constitutional reform. As a result, the constitution may be revised with a majority vote, at least on the surface, yet failing to assure the minority rights has raised doubt on its legitimacy. Many attribute this constitutional instability to the national identity division. They argue that a reasonable constitutional order would be out of the question before a consensus on national identity can be realized. Yet, this article believes that the reverse is also true: national identity would be difficult to consolidate without a respectable constitutional structure. To the chagrin of the author, many in Taiwanese society try to strengthen national identity by giving more constitutional power to the majority, which, seems to the author, weakens respect for the constitution. As the vicious cycle illustrates, society has been further divided as constitutional revisions occurred one after another.

參考文獻


李炳南(1992)。憲政改革與國是會議。台北:永然文化。
沈建德(2003)。台灣血統。台北:前衛出版社。
呂學樟(2003)。修憲風雲錄:凍省秘辛。台北:五南出版社。
何景榮譯、Lane, Jan-Erik、Svante Ersson原著(2002)。新制度主義政治學。台北:韋伯文化。
吳乃德(1996)。自由主義和族群認同:搜尋台灣民族主義的意識形態基礎。台灣政治學刊。創刊號,5-39。

被引用紀錄


黃麗蓉(2006)。國家認同與台灣的未來-政治與戰略的選擇〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2006.00587
秦俊(2013)。兩岸統合可能模式的探討: 歐盟模式與不均等聯邦制對兩岸適用之比較〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.10768
林育德(2012)。赴陸交換學生經驗對認同的影響分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.00269
彭艾喬(2008)。台灣新憲法運動之研究─兩岸關係下的機會與限制〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.02679
廖育信(2007)。全球化對台灣國家認同的影響〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2007.02916

延伸閱讀