透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.93.221
  • 學位論文

教誨而非謾罵:華人組織言教領導的概念建構與效度分析

Verbal reprimand in Chinese organization: Construct development and validation

指導教授 : 鄭伯壎
本文將於2026/06/06開放下載。若您希望在開放下載時收到通知,可將文章加入收藏

摘要


主管罵人的現象在職場中屢見不鮮,但責罵並非都是意圖傷人的惡劣舉動。若從華人文化脈絡觀之,嚴加責備被視為一種督促或鞭策的作法,目的在於借助外塑的力量,透過引發恥感來達到約束與規範個體行動的效果。然而,在探討此一現象時,既有研究多以具有「傷害意圖」的相關構念進行討論,忽略了蘊含深切期許、用心良苦的言語責備所具有的積極意義。為了補足此一缺口,本研究提出具有教誨意涵的言教領導,主張領導者會針對部屬「不合格」與「不夠好」之處給予「規過」與「勸善」,藉以刺激部屬成長。在具體作法上,先透過關鍵事例的內容歸類,建構言教領導的概念向度,並瞭解言教領導的「事由」與其「概念向度」的關聯性;再從部屬觀點檢核各個向度在實際場域的發生率。其次,發展測量工具,並進行一系列的效度檢核。最後,採用恥感機制的觀點,探討「規過」、「勸善」與羞愧行為的關係,以及部屬特性(面子取向與傳統價值)的調節作用。研究結果支持言教領導為一普遍的組織現象,包含「規過」與「勸善」兩個高層次構面,並且部屬傾向解讀為幫助意圖。模式檢驗的結果,證實領導者的「規過」與「勸善」能幫助部屬改過遷善;在規過與工作績效的關係上,面子取向與傳統價值皆具有緩衝作用;而在勸善與工作績效的關係上,面子取向則具有替代效果。最後,進行綜合討論,並提出研究限制、理論貢獻、實務應用及未來藍圖。

並列摘要


Verbal reprimand is a common phenomenon in the workplace. However, leaders may not intend to harm subordinates when reprimanding them. In Chinese context, strict reprimand, which aims to constraint and regulate individual behavior by triggering the feeling of shame, is regarded as a method to urge or spur subordinates. Nevertheless, many studies regard the verbal reprimand as a concept with an intent to harm. These studies ignore the positive meaning of reprimand, which could include profound expectation and well-intentioned. To fill this gap, I suppose that verbal reprimand include teaching and education implications. To be more specific, leaders would apply “regulating (gui-guo)” to subordinates who are unqualified and “persuading (quan-shan)” to subordinates who are not good enough. In other words, leaders hope to urge subordinates to perform better as reprimanding them. First, I collect critical incidents and take content analysis to develop construct dimensions of verbal reprimand. I also examine the relationship of verbal reprimand between the cause and dimensions. In addition, I check the incidence of each dimension in the actual work fields from the point of subordinates view. Next, I develop a verbal reprimand scale, and then conduct series of procedure to establish reliability and validity. Finally, I adopt shaming mechanism as a theory framework to develop the relationship among regulating misconduct, persuading beneficence, and shame actions. Moderating effects of subordinates’ face orientation and authority orientation of traditionality are taking into consideration as well. Results supported that verbal reprimand is a prevalent organizational phenomenon. It consists of two higher level constructs, regulating misconduct and persuading beneficence. Subordinates inclined to interpret the intention of verbal reprimand as helpful. Additionally, verbal reprimand, persuading beneficence in particular, could improve task performance and interpersonal facilitate. Face orientation and traditionality could both buffer the relationship between regulating misconduct and task performance. In the relationship between persuading beneficence and task performance, face orientation has substitution effect. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed, and limitations and future research directions offered.

參考文獻


朱瑞玲、楊淑雯(2013)。臺灣民眾的利環境態度與行為:價值觀與罪感的影響。「環境教育研究」,9(2),91–129。
高三福、陳鈺芳(2006)。運動教練的教誨領導:高中運動團隊的個案研究。「大專體育學刊」,8(1),97–111。
周婉茹、周麗芳、鄭伯壎、任金剛(2010)。專權與尚嚴之辨:再探威權領導的內涵與恩威並濟的效果。「本土心理學研究」,34,223–284。
吳宗祐(2008)。主管權威領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾:信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果。「本土心理學研究」,30,3–63。
林文瑛(2003)。教養關背後的人性觀——以能力觀為例。「本土心理學研究」,20,253–293。

延伸閱讀