本研究旨在探討桃園縣國民小學校長家長式領導型態與教師專業自主之現況,不同背景變項的校長自覺家長式領導及教師知覺在家長式領導、教師專業自主行為上的差異情形,進一步了解校長家長式領導與教師專業自主之關係。 本研究採用問卷調查法,以桃園縣國民小學校長及教師為母群體,實際有效樣本數校長36 份、教師453 份,佔總樣本數的77%及78%。以「校長家長式領導問卷」與「教師專業自主問卷」為研究工具,採t檢定、單因子變異數、皮爾遜積差相關、典型相關及多元逐步迴歸分析之,歸納本研究結論如下: 1. 校長自覺其家長式領導型態屬中上程度。 2. 教師對校長家長式領導具有中上程度的評價。 3. 教師有中上程度的教師專業自主行為。 4. 校長的背景變項並不會造成在家長式領導上的差異。 5. 教師的性別、年齡、年資、師培來源、擔任職務與學校規模的不同在知覺校長家長式領導上有部分差異。 6. 教師性別、年資、教育程度、師培來源、擔任職務、學校所在區域與學校規模的不同在知覺教師專業自主上有部分差異。 7. 校長的家長式領導型態與教師專業自主有相關性存在。 8. 校長家長式領導對教師專業自主具預測力。
Abstract The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the principals’ paternalistic leadership and the teachers’ professional autonomy of the elementary schools in Taoyuan County. The questionnaires were mailed to the principals and teachers who were sampled from Taoyuan County and valid sample included 36 principals and 453 teachers. The valid return rate was 77% for principals’ sample and 78 % for teachers’ sample. The major instrument contained two subcales, the principals’ paternalistic leadership scale, teachers’ professional autonomy scale.Analytic data are rendered in some ways, including descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA,Pearson product-moment correlation, canonical correlation, and stepwise regression analysis. The major findings are as the following: 1. Principals evaluated their paternalistic leadership were in medium-high range. 2. The principals’ paternalistic leadership were evaluated by teachers were in medium-high range. 3. Teachers percepted their teachers’ professional autonomy behavior were in medium-high range. 4. There were no significant differences of perception of paternalistic leadership for principals in terms of their background variables. 5. There were significant differences of perception of principal’s paternalistic leadership for teachers in terms of their background variables such as gender, age, serving years, training resources,positions and school size. 6. There were significant differences of perception of teachers’ professional autonomy for teachers in terms of their background variables such as gender, serving years, educational degree, training resources ,positions,area and school size. 7. There were significant correlations between principals’ paternalistic leadership and teachers’ professional autonomy. 8. Principals’ paternalistic leadership can significantly predict teachers’ professional autonomy.