監察院糾正權之研究

The Study on Corrective Measures of Control Yuan

張麗雅(LiYa Chang)

指導教授 ： 李炳南

國立臺灣大學/社會科學院/國家發展研究所/碩士(2012年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.10874

摘要

監察院糾正權於學術研究上可探究之面向甚廣，可分就糾正權行使之主體、客體、對象、程序、性質、效力、權限、體制與效益，甚或與立法監督權之差異性及績效等實務面研究。本論文除從法律、學說與實務案例對糾正權權限、糾正案構成要件、糾正權效力等外部效應作論述外，並透過實務之統計分析結果，呈現糾正權行使現狀，目的在藉由研究以確立糾正權之憲法地位，肯定糾正案之效益，進而對提升糾正權之效益作出建議。
本研究以97年8月1日第4屆監察委員就任迄100年7月31日止，此3年期間糾正案之成立、審查等實務現象，探究監察院委員會之會議體制及糾正權呈現之各種現象，全文共分五章，第一章為緒論，說明本研究之動機與目的、研究途徑與方法及研究設計，並提出本研究所受之限制；第二章為文獻回顧，除對文中所提相關名詞作界定外，並回顧權力分立、合議制組織及法理論等理論制度，同時亦從國內研究著作中，與本文有關之著作或論述作檢討；第三章為探討監察院糾正權之法制爭議，分從法律、學說與個案研析中，就糾正權之行使時機、構成要件與效力作評論；第四章則提出有關監察院糾正權實務的若干現象，除就糾正權之主體與客體作論述外，並透過統計與量化方法，將普查結果分成四個構面，呈現糾正權之實務現況；第五章為結論，就前述章節中對糾正權之評論與實務現況，提出研究結論與後續研究建議。

關鍵字

糾正權,糾正效益 ； 糾正時機 ； 權力分立 ； 委員獨立制 ； 監察積極主義

並列摘要

The Control Yuan’s power of corrective measures offers a wide range of topics to be explored in academic research, from the subjects and objects of the corrective measures power and questions involving procedures, properties, efficacy, authority and systems, to practical differences between the corrective measures power and the power of legislative oversight and their relative merits. In addition to analyzing the discourse on the limits, elements and efficiency of corrective measures from legal, theoretical and practical perspectives, this paper uses empirical data to explore the current situation with respect to the Control Yuan’s exercise of corrective measures. This analysis affirms the efficacy of the corrective measures power and its standing in the Constitution. The study concludes by offering some suggestions for improving the effectiveness of corrective measures.
This study focuses on the structure of committee sessions and the exercise of the power of corrective measures by reviewing corrective cases approved by the Fourth Control Yuan from August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2011. The study is comprised of five chapters. The first chapter is an introduction outlining the motivation, purpose, methodology, design and limitations of the study. The second chapter is a literature review that covers terminology, an overview of the separation of powers, committee organization, legal theory and other theoretical foundations. This section also reviews and evaluates some of the relevant domestic literature. The third chapter discusses the legal debates surrounding the Control Yuan’s corrective measures- with a particular focus on the timing, elements, and effectiveness of each corrective measure- based on a review of current regulations, theories and case studies. The fourth chapter identifies a number of outcomes related to the Control Yuan’s corrective practices. In addition to a discussion of the subject and object of corrective measures, this chapter employs statistics and quantitative methods to present the survey results in four dimensions, thus reflecting the current situation of the exercise of corrective measures. The final chapter concludes with the findings of the study and offers suggestions for potential follow-up studies focusing on the power to propose corrective measures.

並列關鍵字

Corrective Measures ； Corrective Efficacy ； Corrective Time ； Separation of Powers ； Committee of Independent Members ； Control Yuan Supervisory Activism

參考文獻

許盟顯，2010，《監察院糾彈權與公務員課責之研究》，國立臺灣大學社會科學院政治學系碩士論文。

陳健民、周育仁，2001，《九七修憲與憲政發展》，台北：財團法人國家政策研究基金會。

陳運星，2000，〈論監察院的糾正權：法理學的觀點1〉，收錄於台中：朝陽科技大學編印《朝陽學報》第六期。

陳顯武、葛祥林，2003，〈法價值論中之超人格主義〉，《臺大法學論叢》32卷2期。

李文郎，2005，《修憲後我國監察制度和芬蘭國會監察使制度之比較分析》，國立政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所博士論文。