Title

矽晶太陽能產業經營績效之研究:臺灣與大陸實證

Translated Titles

Evaluating the Operation Performance of Solar Cell Industry : Empirical Research in Taiwan and China

DOI

10.6838/YZU.2013.00085

Authors

盧嘉宏

Key Words

金融海嘯 ; 太陽能產業 ; 二階段資料包絡分析 ; 麥氏生產力指數 ; Financial Tsunami ; solar cell industry ; Two-stage DEA ; Malmquist productivity index

PublicationName

元智大學管理碩士在職專班學位論文

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

2013年

Academic Degree Category

碩士

Advisor

王維康

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

太陽能產業是長期再生能源的重要產業,本研究目的在於分析2007年到2010年期間經歷金融海嘯時,臺灣與大陸之太陽能廠商之經營績效,採以二階段資料包絡分析法將績效分成獲利能力與市場能力效率值,並以麥氏生產力指數分析四年總生產力變化,最後進一步以管理決策矩陣分析,提供相對無效率之矽晶太陽能業者經理人建議方向以改善經營績效。在Two-stage DEA分析結果,在獲利能力階段有約將近43%矽晶太陽能廠商相對無效率,市場能力階段則有74%廠商相對無效率。Malmquist生產力指數分析結果,2007年至2010年的總生產力變動呈現大幅衰退60.3%,主因來自於技術效率衰退55%,規模效率方面也衰退了25.2%。矽晶太陽能產業規模效率有81%的DMUs呈現遞減,顯示投入資源配置過多或管理決上有錯誤所造成。管理決策矩陣顯示矽晶太陽能產業有10家廠商落在獲利能力與市場能力皆具較佳效率值的象限I,是該產業於2007年至2010年的領導廠商,可作為其他未達相對效率廠商的學習對象。

English Abstract

Solar cell industry is an important industry for long-term renewable energy development. In this study we applied Two-Stage data envelopment analysis (Two-Stage DEA) approach to explore the profitability and marketability efficiency of solar cell industry in Taiwan and China suffering the financial tsunami in the period 2007-2010. We also utilizes Malmquist productivity index (MPI) to analyze overall total factor production change from 2007 to 2010 and furthermore propose the managerial decision-making matrix to provide suggestions in order for managers in inefficient solar cell industry to improve their operation performance. The Two-Stage DEA results indicate that approximately 43 percent of the solar cell companies have relative inefficiency in the profitability efficiency process and 74 percent of them are inefficient in the marketability efficiency process. Four years of Malmquist productivity Index annual results show that total factor production change (TFP) sharp declined by 60.3% which results from technical efficiency (TE) declined by 55%, and also scale efficiency (SE) declined 25%. Approximate 81% DMUs of solar cell industry is trend-down on scale efficiency, which means allocation of input sources is too much or some mistake had been made about decision-making. Ten solar cell companies are in zone 1 in the decision-making matrix represent leading position in the period 2007-2010. These ten solar cell companies can be benchmarks and may provide inefficient solar cell companies to learn with.

Topic Category 管理學院 > 管理碩士在職專班
社會科學 > 管理學
Reference
  1. 1. 王本正、莊銘國、宋明弘、林建銘、蔡宛珊、王昭懿(2008),「亞太地區太陽光電產業之績效評估:應用資料包絡分析法」,臺灣企業績效學刊,第1卷第2期,229-249。
    連結:
  2. 3. 李正文、陳翔修(2008),「臺灣光電產業之經營效率分析-資料包絡分析法之應用」,中原企管評論,第6卷第1期,1-30。
    連結:
  3. 4. 林志偉(2010),「臺灣矽晶太陽能光電產業之績效分析—隨機邊界生產函數法之應用」,未出版碩士論文,臺北大學經濟學系,56-58。
    連結:
  4. 5. 洪秀婉、林美惠、王安邦(2008),「全球網路零售公司經營績效之研究」,電子商務學報,第10卷第2期,359-377。
    連結:
  5. 8. 陳富強、馮淑琴、方顯光(2011),「探討臺灣地區本國銀行獲利能力與市場能力一二階段DEA」,華人經濟研究,第9卷第2期,33-52。
    連結:
  6. 9. 黃丙雄(2008),「太陽能光電產業關鍵成功因素之研究-AHP法之運用」,未出版碩士論文,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班,46-48。
    連結:
  7. 10. 劉文光(2009),「臺灣矽晶圓太陽能產業經營模式之分析」,未出版碩士論文,中原大學企業管理學系,66-67。
    連結:
  8. 1. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. & Cooper, W.W. (1984), Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science, Vol.30, 1078-1092.
    連結:
  9. 3. Brockett, P. L. & Golany, B.(1996), Using rank statictic for determing programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, Vol.42, 467-472.
    連結:
  10. 4. Caves, D., Chistensen, L.R., & Diewert, W. (1982), The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity, Econometrica, Vol.50(6), 1393-1414.
    連結:
  11. 6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Golany B., Seiford, L.M. & Stutz, J. (1985), Foundations of Data Envelopment Analysis for Pareto–Koopmans Efficient Empirical Production -functions, Journal of Econometrics, Vol.30, 91–107.
    連結:
  12. 7. Chen, Y, Cook, W.D. & Zhu, J. (2010), Deriving the DEA Frontier for Two-Stage Processes, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.202, 138-132.
    連結:
  13. 8. Chen, Y.S. & Chen, B.Y. (2011),Applying DEA, MPI, and Grey Model to Explore the Operation Performance of the Taiwanese Wafer Fabrication Industry, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.78(3),536-546.
    連結:
  14. 9. Chueh, H.E. & Jheng, J.Y. (2012), Applying Data Envelopment Analysis to Evaluation of Taiwanese Solar Cell Industry Operational Performance, International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, Vol.4(4), 1-8.
    連結:
  15. 10. Cook, W.D. & Seiford, L.M. (2009), Data envelopment analysis (DEA) – Thirty Year on, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.191, 1-17.
    連結:
  16. 11. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L.M. & Tone, K. (2000), Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA.
    連結:
  17. 12. Cristina, A.B., Sten, A.T., & Joaquina, L. (2004), Fundamental Analysis of Stocks by Two-Stage DEA, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol.25, 231-241.
    連結:
  18. 14. Farrell, M.J. (1957), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, Vol.120, 253-290.
    連結:
  19. 16. Ho, B.C.T.(2008), Measuring Profitability and Marketability in Internet Companies, The Open Management Journal, Vol.1, 12-25.
    連結:
  20. 17. Huang, M.Y. & Huang, S.Y. (2010), Productivity Evaluation of Taiwanese Semiconductor Companies: Using a Three-stage Malmquist DEA Approach, Taiwan Journal of Applied Economics, Vol.87, 31-57.
    連結:
  21. 18. Kao, C. & Hwang, S.N. (2008), Efficiency Decomposition in Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Non-life Insurance Companies in Taiwan, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.185, 418-429.
    連結:
  22. 19. Lewin, A. Y. & Minton, J. W. (1986), Determining Organization Effectiveness: Another Look and an Agenda for Research, Management Science, Vol.32, 514-538.
    連結:
  23. 20. Lu, W.M. & Hung, S.W. (2009), Evaluating Profitability and Marketability of Taiwan's IC Fabless Firms: An DEA Approach, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, Vol.8, 851-857.
    連結:
  24. 21. Luo, X. (2003), Evaluating the Profitability and Marketability Efficiency of Large Banks an Application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of Business Research, Vol.56, 627-635.
    連結:
  25. 22. Seiford, L.M., & Zhu, J. (1999), Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks, Management Science, Vol.45, 1270-1288.
    連結:
  26. 24. Shephard, R. W. (1970), Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
    連結:
  27. 25. Wang, W.K. (2005), A Knowledge-based Decision Support System for Measuring the Performance of Government Real Estate Investment, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.29(4), 901-912.
    連結:
  28. 26. Wu, D.D. & Ho, C.T.B. (2007), Productivity and Efficiency Analysis of Taiwan's Integrated Circuit Industry, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol.56(8), 715-730.
    連結:
  29. 27. Zhu, J. (2000), Multi-factor Performance Measure Model with an Application to Fortune 500 Companies, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.123, 105-124.
    連結:
  30. 一、中文
  31. 2. 末吉俊幸(2006),經營效率分析法-DEA,臺北:鼎茂,11-25。
  32. 6. 高強、黃旭男、末吉俊幸(2003),管理績效評估-資料包絡分析法,臺北:華泰,51-66。
  33. 7. 孫遜(2004),資料包絡分析法-理論與應用,臺北:揚智,17-31。
  34. 二、英文
  35. 2. Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R. G. & Thanassoulis, E. (1991), Applied Data Envelopment Analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.52, 1-15.
  36. 5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., & Rhodes E. (1978), Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.2, 429-444.
  37. 13. F#westeur037#re, R, Grosskopf, S, Norris, M. & Zhang, Z. (1994), Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries, American Economic Review, Vol.84, 66-83.
  38. 15. Golany, B. & Roll, Y. (1989), An Application Procedure for DEA, Omega International Journal of Management Sciences, Vol.17(3), 237-250.
  39. 23. Sexton, T. R., & Lewis, H. F. (2003), Two-stage DEA:an Application to Major League Baseball, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol.38, 227-249.
Times Cited
  1. 劉祐廷(2015)。我國營造與不動產業的經營效率分析。義守大學管理碩博士班學位論文。2015。1-92。 
  2. 蒲永孝(2007)。台灣地區醫學中心多角化經營之策略。臺灣大學高階公共管理組學位論文。2007。1-115。
  3. 吳錦河(2012)。生技產品多角化策略診所醫師接受度研究。中臺科技大學健康產業管理研究所學位論文。2012。1-87。
  4. 陳育津(2013)。台灣動物用藥品商關鍵成功要素、領導風格和經營策略之研究。中正大學企業管理學系學位論文。2013。1-89。