透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.218.129.100
  • 學位論文

台灣地區大學教育學門學術表現之研究

Exploring academic performance of educational disciplines in Taiwan

指導教授 : 張鈿富

摘要


本研究目的旨在探討台灣地區教育學門的背景因素(男女教師人數、教師職級、國內外博士人數、公私立大學數)與學術表現的關係。以台灣地區設有教育相關學系共52所為研究對象,並採資料蒐集近五年的學術表現資料(Scopus 論文發表數、TCI-HSS發表數、科技部研究案數),再進行描述性統計分析、獨立樣本 T檢定 、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關係數和雪費事後檢定。 其中以科技部研究案數進行相關與差異分析。本研究重要的結果歸納如下: 一、教師職級對於科技部研究案數達顯著差異 二、公私立大學數對於科技部研究案數達顯著差異 三、教師職級對於科技部研究案數達顯著正相關 四、公私立大學數對於科技部研究案數達顯著負相關 最後,依據研究結果提出研究結論與建議,提供相關單位人員做為未來研究之參考

並列摘要


The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between the background factors and academic performance of pedagogy in Taiwan. The background factors include the number of male and female teachers, the academic ranks of teachers, the number of teachers with a PhD degree from a domestic or foreign university, and the number of public and private universities. The academic performance is measured by the number of Scopus papers published, the number of papers published in core journals in education, and the number of research projects sponsored by MOST (Ministry of Science and Technology). A total of 52 education departments are studied. The data over the past five years of these departments are surveyed and analyzed by descriptive statistical analysis, independent samples T test, single-factor analysis of variance, Pearson product-difference correlation coefficient, and Scheffe' post hoc test. The correlation and variance between each background factor and the number of research projects sponsored by MOST are analyzed. The important results are summarized as follows: 1 The academic ranks of teachers and the number of MOST projects have a significant difference. 2 The number of public and private universities and the number of MOST projects have a significant difference. 3 The academic ranks of teachers and the number of MOST projects are significantly positive correlated. 4 The number of public and private universities and the number of MOST projects are significantly negative correlated. Finally, based on the research results, the suggestions for further researches are provided.

參考文獻


李崗 (2011)。「學術貢獻」該如何界定?台灣教育評論月刊,1(2),11-13。
吳挺鋒 (2008)。從粗放到精耕的高等教育改革-兼評《全球化與知識生產 - 反思台灣學術評鑑》。台灣社會研究季刊,69,265-280。
吳清山 (2011)。正視臺灣學術研究評比的迷思。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(2), 5-7。
吳紹群、陳雪華(2011)。人文學專書出版問題對學術傳播之影響。大學圖書館, 15(2),39-61。
林宜箴 (2010)。台灣學術近親繁殖現象與學術生產力之研究 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。

延伸閱讀