透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.15.147.53
  • 期刊

他山之石-美國和澳洲執行「公開揭露」機制之經驗與啟示

A Comparative Study of the "Open Disclosure" Policy in the United States and Australia: Lessons for Taiwan

摘要


歐美先進國家陸續採行公開揭露機制,以公開、分析,以及學習的態度處理醫療不良事件,期待降低醫療訴訟成本和不良事件再發生的可能性。美國是最早實施公開揭露機制的國家,澳洲則在整體政策發展的最為完整。因此,本文希望藉由耙梳美澳兩國公開揭露制度的發展歷史與現況,思索該制度對台灣建構醫療不良事件處理機制的啟發。從美澳兩國經驗來看,本文建議有二:第一,衛生主管機關應規劃執行大型醫療不良事件流行病學研究,促使醫療體系正視醫療傷害問題;第二,結合多元的社會行動者建立配套的社會立法和推動教育宣導,使台灣朝公開揭露醫療不良事件的目標邁進。

並列摘要


In Europe and North America, a few developed countries have gradually implemented an ”open disclosure” mechanism characterized by openness, analysis, and learning in dealing with adverse medical events, so that the cost of medical litigation and the reoccurrence rate of adverse medical events can be decreased. The United States was the earliest country to implement an open disclosure mechanism, while Australia has developed the most comprehensive policy. This paper reviewed the histories and current status of the open disclosure mechanism in the United States and Australia to derive implications for constructing a disclosure mechanism for adverse medical events in Taiwan. Two suggestions were made after a review of the two countries' experiences. First, the dominant Department of Health should plan and conduct large-scale epidemiologic research on adverse medical events to force the medical system to face the issue of medical injury seriously. Second, social action supporters in various areas should be mobilized to propose comprehensive social legislation, promote education, and advocate for Taiwan to move toward the goal of dealing with adverse medical events with open disclosure.

參考文獻


朱柔若、林東龍(2003)。醫療公道如何討?台灣醫療糾紛處理機制弊病之探索。醫事法學。11,31-61。
林東龍、朱柔若、陳武宗(2009)。「搓圓子湯」或「醫療正義」─醫療糾紛「第三方」之探索性研究。醫事法學。16,43-69。
謝啟瑞(1994)。醫療糾紛風險與防禦性醫療行為。人文及社會科學集刊。6,199-230。
Sorensen, R.,Iedema, R.,Piper, D.,Manias, E.,Williams, A.,Tuckett A.(2008).Health care professionals' views of implementing a policy of open disclosure of errors.J Health Serv Res Policy.13,227-32.
Kraman, S. S.,Hamm, G.(1999).Risk management: extreme honesty may be the best policy.Ann Intern Med.131,963-7.

被引用紀錄


陶楷韻(2014)。醫療糾紛解決模式之探討〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.10283
張修維、翁詩亮、蔡家瑜、林東龍(2019)。台灣醫療機構執行公開揭露機制之可行性分析台灣公共衛生雜誌38(6),633-645。https://doi.org/10.6288/TJPH.201912_38(6).108105
曹嘉珞、唐福瑩(2018)。探討醫護人員對醫療及給藥錯誤告知之態度及障礙醫務管理期刊19(4),263-281。https://doi.org/10.6174/JHM.201812_19(4).263
林美珍、龔建吉、許哲瀚、趙建蕾、張馨云、郭慈安、洪弘昌、葉麗月(2021)。探討照顧服務員於友善住院照顧模式下之職業倦怠及管路安全認知健康促進研究與實務4(2),16-24。https://doi.org/10.29442/HPRP.202107_4(2).0003
李進建(2016)。論醫療過失之民事損害賠償責任〔博士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614042865

延伸閱讀