以醫療照護失效模式與效應分析促進輸血安全

Promoting Transfusion Safety by Failure Mode and Effects Analysis

陳瓊汝(Chiung-Ju Chen) ； 叢培瓏(Pei- Lung Tsung) ； 高淑美(Shu-Mei Kao) ； 溫武慶(Wu-Ching Uen) ； 鄭瑞楠(Jui-Nan Cheng) ； 陳東榮(Tong-Jong Chen)

《台灣醫學》 19卷2期 (2015/03) Pp. 170-177

https://doi.org/10.6320/FJM.2015.19(2).09

摘要

輸血安全仰賴多單位的團隊合作與專業的判斷，為高風險醫療流程。人為疏忽即可能導致病人不可逆或永久性的傷害。台北某醫學中心回溯過去5年間，平均輸血跡近錯失約0.23%，不良事件0.001%。為進一步改善輸血作業的安全，我們運用HFMEA手法評估及探討輸血過程中可能錯誤的原因，並提出一系列方案來預防或降低錯誤。我們組成跨科部團隊，依輸血標準作業程序逐步分析，找出可能發生危機的原因或影響，進而導入必要的改善方法以及整合實驗室資訊系統與行動化的條碼系統設備等，從28項方案中最後採行了12個改善方法。導入改善方案後再重新評估，所有風險均下降，多個評量指標也持續進步，明顯改善了輸血安全。未來我們仍然會持續進行改善與系統性的監控管理。

關鍵字

醫療照護失效模式與效益分析 ； 輸血安全 ； 危害分析 ； 決策樹分析 ； 條碼系統

並列摘要

The safety of blood transfusion depends on multidisciplinary teamwork and professional judgments. It is a high-risk process in medical practice. Even an unexpected error may result in inevitable or serious injuries of the patients. In a retrospective analysis of 5-year period in a medical center at Taipei, a near miss of 0.23% and adverse event of 0.001% per year were found. To further improve the safety of blood transfusion, we conducted a series of activities using Health Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (HFMEA) assessment. A multidisciplinary team was assigned to examine the standard transfusion procedures step by step, to review the causes and effects critically, and to implant improvement programs as needed, with the incorporation of laboratory information system and computerized mobile barcode equipment. Among 28 items, 12 were adjusted. In conclusion, a significant improvement of the safety of blood transfusion has been achieved. However, a continuous improvement and systemic monitoring is mandatory.

並列關鍵字

healthcare failure mode and effects analysis (HFMEA) ； blood transfusion safety ； hazard analysis ； decision tree ； barcode system

參考文獻

10. 陳惠君、黃小芬、劉曾珊：條碼科技於改善護理檢體採集標示錯誤之成效。澄清醫護管理雜誌2012;8:56-64。[Hui-Chun Chen, Shiou-Feng Huang, Tseng-Shan Liu, et al :Implementation of Bar Code Technology to Minimize Labeling Errors of Specimens Collected by Nurses. Cheng Vhing Medical Journal : 2012;8:56-64]

11. 林愛珍、蔡祐安、蔡秋聲：運用預先防範型改善程序提昇輸血安全。台灣醫檢會報 2012;27:94-102。[Ai-Jen Lin, You-An Tasi, Chiu-Sheng Tasi: Using Precautionary improvement Process to Promote Transfusion Safety. Bulletin of Taiwan Society of Laboratory Medicine 2012;27:94-102]

1. DeRosier J, Stalhandske E, Bagian JP, et al: Using health care Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: the VA National Center for Patient Safety's prospective risk analysis system. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2002;28:248-67.

3. 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策會：台灣病人安全通報系統2011年年報。臺北，醫策會，2012:114-16。[Taiwan Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation: Taiwan Patient-safety Reporting System Annual Report 2011. Taipei, Taiwan Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation, 2012:114-16]

4. Dzik WH, Murphy MF, Andreu G, et al: An international study of the performance of sample collection from patients. Vox Sanguinis 2003;85:40-7.