透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.216.123.120
  • 期刊

高職男生父職角色知覺與認同之研究

A Study on the Perception and Identity of Fatherhood by Vocational High School Male Students

摘要


本研究旨在探討高職男生不同變項(個人背景變項、父親父職變項)影響其父職角色知覺與認同(涵蓋四層面:陪伴與支持、照顧與管教、教育與栽培、養家與身教)之差異比較。本研究採用「量化為主,質性為輔」的混合方法設計。先抽選屏東縣市公私立高職在學男生為受試母群體進行問卷調查,有效樣本達525人,所得量化資料以T考驗、單因子變異數分析及逐步多元迴歸分析等統計方法處理之;再邀請八位高職在學男生進行半結構式個別訪談,所得質性資料以主題分析法處理之;最後透過三角檢定進行交叉驗證。本研究結果發現如下。1.在父職角色知覺與認同各分層面比較上,高職男生評價最重要的是「養家與身教」,最不重要的是「教育與栽培」。2.「父親管教方式」與「父子關係」最能預測高職男生的父職角色知覺與認同。3.高職男生受訪資料分析後浮現其在父職角色知覺與認同上的六項主題。

並列摘要


The main purpose of this study was to explore what were the different influences of variables, individual background and his father's fatherhood, on the perception and identity of fatherhood by vocational high school male students in Pingtung. There are four categories of fatherhood been defined, including "Accompanying and Supporting", "Caring and Disciplining", "Educating and Culturing", and "Rearing and Modeling". Questionnaires and Interviews were used as "mixed method designs"(QUAN+ qual)in this study. Some statistical methods such as "t-test", "one-way ANOVA", and "stepwise multiple regression analysis" were used to deal with the data from questionnaires. The method of "thematic analysis" was used to deal with the data from interviews. And then the method of "triangulation" was used to "cross-check" these results mentioned above. The findings of this study are as follows. 1.On the perception and identity of fatherhood by vocational high school male students in Pingtung, "Rearing and Modeling" was recognized as the most important, and "Educating and Culturing" as the less. 2.The variables such as "Ways of father's discipline" and "Relationship between father and son" could predict more on the perception and identity of fatherhood by vocational high school male students in Pingtung. 3.There are six topics on "the perception and identity of fatherhood" emerged from the content of interviews with vocational high school male students.

參考文獻


毛萬儀、黃迺毓(2010)。初任父親第一年父職經驗歷程之研究:以六位大專教育程度父親為例。人類發展與家庭學報。12,31-53。
王大維(2000)。父職參與或參與親職的父親。應用心理研究。7,12-22。
王振寰編、瞿海源編(2009)。社會學與臺灣社會。高雄:巨流。
王舒芸、余漢儀(1997)。奶爸難為:雙薪家庭之父職角色初探。婦女與兩性學刊。8,115-149。
王新台()。,未出版。

被引用紀錄


劉凡嘉(2014)。性別角色取向、共依附特質與高中生生涯成熟度之相關研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2014.00381
許庭瑜(2017)。新住民家庭之國中身心障礙學生父親實踐父職之經驗〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201700308
吳黛宜(2002)。已婚男性父職態度與實踐之研究-以台北市為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1904200713372670
魏秀珍(2004)。軍職父親之父職意涵研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2004200709192963
陳維君(2006)。外籍配偶家庭父職教育需求之研究─以育有學齡兒童父親為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0712200716140847

延伸閱讀