透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.217.116.183
  • 期刊

解說人員專業能力指標建立之研究

The Indicator Establishment for the Ability of Professional Interpreters

摘要


本研究目的主要在探討解說人員專業能力及各指標之權重,藉以作為未來建構解說人員服務之依據。在界定解說人員專業能力指標部份主要以文獻回顧及專家問卷;並以模糊德爾菲法(Fuzzy Delphi Method)萃取從政府和學術單位專家意見以篩選評估指標。然後,再利用層級分析程序法(Analytic Hierarchy Process)以求解說人員專業能力指標之權重,進而探討不同專家間之差異。研究結果期能並協助單位提供參考。第一階段以模糊德爾菲法建構指標,經過兩回合的專家學者篩選,其解說專業能力指標確定題項為33題;第二階段在AHP之問卷中整體而言其問卷結果分析,第一層級指標中以「專業態度」(44.90%)之權重值最高,可得知大多數專家學者認為有好的解說,首先要具備的是專業態度;第二層級在「專業知識」中以「解說教育成效」(10.86%)為最重要;在「導覽技能」中以「解說技巧與能力」(11.12%)為最重要;在「專業態度」中以「專業表現」(27.19%)為最重要,由此可得知在解說過程中,頇具備良好的解說技巧能力與專業態度,也能讓遊客不僅參觀展場也得到了啟發育知識。

並列摘要


The interpreters' professional ability indicators were mainly collected by literature review, experts' questionnaire. Fuzzy Delphi Method was used to extract the experts' opinion from the government and academic units. Then the weights of the indicators were calculated through the use of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The proposition of the interpreters' professional ability indicators will provide the evaluation tool for the interpretation service issues and assist in providing references for units. The first stage of the Fuzzy Delphi Method to construct indicators, experts and scholars after two rounds of screening, indicators of their ability to explain professional items and 33 questions to determine the problem; the second phase of the AHP of the questionnaire on the whole the results of its survey the first level indicators to ”professional attitude” (44.90%) of the highest weights, that most experts believe may have a good explanation, we must first have a professional attitude; the second level in the ”expertise” in to ”explain the educational effectiveness” (10.86%) were the most important; in the ”navigation skills” in order to ”explain the skills and ability” (11.12%) were the most important; in the ”professional attitude” with ”professional performance” (27.19%) is the most important, which can be explained that in the process, must have good ability to explain the skills and professional attitude, but also allow visitors to not only visit the exhibition has also been inspired by education knowledge.

參考文獻


王德昌(2007)。阿里磅生態農場生態旅遊遊客對人員解說滿意度分析(碩士論文)。國立東華大學自然資源管理研究所。
王鑫()。,未出版。
王鑫()。,未出版。
江宜珍(2002)。運用重要─表現程度分析法探討國立科學工藝博物館解說媒體成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學環境教育研究所。
吳忠宏(2001)。解說員認證制度之研議。臺灣林業。27(5),52-60。

被引用紀錄


陳文雅(2017)。社區生態導覽解說員基礎培訓專業知能之需求評估- 以「陽明山古蹟聚落生態護育聯盟」為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00791
嚴春鳳(2013)。藝術解說與體驗品質關係之探究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201300623
施亦婕、林靜萍(2020)。臺灣與大陸桌球教練證照研習培訓課程之比較運動教練科學(57),1-12。https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.202003_(57).0001
張倫瑋(2013)。休閒農場從業人員專業能力對遊客農業體驗與產品消費意願之研究〔碩士論文,國立高雄餐旅大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0018-2206201302050100
姜立浩(2016)。澎湖國家風景區生態旅遊服務系統指標建構之研究〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0042-1805201714162111

延伸閱讀