本文藉由新敘事學論述,以台灣報導文學的部分文本為分析對象,探究建立報導文學虛構敘事規約的可能性,以及在此一敘事規約下如何突破「作為文學附庸的報導」和「作為報導附庸的文學」的兩難,在話語策略上達到既能關照社會現實又能觀照歷史真實,涵容時間性與空間性的開放疆界。通過報導文學佳作地文本分析,本文初步歸納當前台灣報導文學的敘事規約共有四端:一、集中於悲劇模式的情節詮釋/舖排,二、運用話語修辭彰顯敘事目的和話語意義,三、挪用相關文獻以模擬或重建現場與景觀,四、長於散文敘事而拙於小說場景建構。本文建議,台灣報導文學的書寫,宜打破真實與虛構的兩極界分和侷限,把故事說好,用好的敘事規約說故事,無論在敘事策略、方法或書寫實踐上,兼採歷史敘事的存真和文學譬喻的指涉,以使報導文學書寫能夠寓真實於虛構、借虛構指真實,展開既能關照社會與歷史真實,又能涵容時空、跨越時空的文學想像世界,而建立其文類相異於散文或小說的獨特性。
The method of this paper depends in Narratologies, discussion the possible of the Fiction Narrative Convention of Taiwanese Reportage, and how the discourse strategy could not only look after the social reality but insight the historical part, to make reportage and literature demands timeliness and spatiality became an open boundary. In this paper, there are four findings referring to the Fiction Narrative Conventions of Taiwanese reportage based on the analysis of some excellent contemporary reportage works: 1.focus on tragedy model presenting; 2.using dialogue to manifest the main point and meaning;3. to rebuilt the scene by consult reference materials;4.good at essays writing instead of novels. In sum, according to the findings, this paper suggests that the later Taiwanese reportage writing can take following strategies into consideration. Making reportage real through fiction activities, using narrative conventions in telling a story, combine with tactics, skills to practice reportage that narrative fiction can be borrowed as a cross-genre approach to set the peculiarity.