並列摘要
This article opens a new horizon via interpreting Paul's theology of the Cross from his experience in eyesight loss. Jews search for ＂signs＂ and Greeks look for ＂wisdom＂. Both are rational attitudes. But from the perspective of the Cross of God, there is no sign and wisdom. The author places the ＂logic＂ of theology of the Cross under the horizon of deconstructive thoughts, and constructs a deconstructive theology which is compatible with theology of the Cross. This destructive theology criticizes visual-centered thoughts. The ＂logic＂ of the Cross can only be ＂para-logic＂: foolish, which is different from an visual-centered eyesight of faith. Therefore, believers need to be ＂blind＂ from a point of de-visualization. Paradoxically speaking, the cross is the horizon of the blind and the horizon provides a new, incomprehensible and impossible experience about ＂the Otherness.＂
並列關鍵字
無資料延伸閱讀
- Jasper, D. (2008). 九一一後的基督教詮釋學：虛無主義與關注的詮釋學. 漢語基督教學術論評, (6), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.30106/SCSAIJBTP.200812.0001
- 莊嘉慶（1992）。後現代世界的神學典範轉換－從第十期之“典範轉換與信仰的反省”談起。新使者，(12)，48-50。https://doi.org/10.29949/TNM.199210.0015
- 李卓然（2021）。彎曲的十架：論冰心1951年後作品中的基督信仰。漢語基督教學術論評，(32)，63-87。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=19902670-202112-202208250014-202208250014-63-87
- 曾慶豹（2015）。Faith, Deconstruction and Radical Hermeneutics。哲學與文化，42(8)，91-107。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10158383-201508-201508170002-201508170002-91-107
- 林鴻信（2008）。Theology as a Way of Life。道風：基督教文化評論，(29)，103-122。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20170411002-200807-201705100024-201705100024-103-122