本論文應用能源分析軟體eQUEST於節能效益量測驗證選項D之可行性評估,並撰寫其標準作業程序。 模擬案例為北部某政府辦公大樓,其為地下3層及地上17層的建築物,以兩種不同作業流程進行討論。結果顯示兩種不同作業流程經由電腦模擬計算,對於系統改善之模擬皆可計算出合理的節能率。 使用方法一作M&V選項D時,開始先收集輸入模擬軟體時所需資料,將資料分析後輸入得到改善後之結果,並與改善後實際耗電進行比對校正,完成Base Line Model。再將改善前之設備及性能曲線替換至模型中,得到改善前設備於改善後使用條件下運轉之模擬結果,最後將模擬結果與改善後電費單進行比較,最後計算出實際之節能量。 使用方法二作M&V選項D時,開始先收集輸入模擬軟體時所需資料,將資料分析後輸入得到改善前之結果,並與改善前實際耗電進行比對校正,完成Base Line Model。再將改善後之設備及性能曲線替換至模型中,得到改善後設備於改善前使用條件下運轉之模擬結果,最後將模擬結果與改善前電費單進行比較,最後計算出實際之節能量。
This thesis has made use of energy analysis software eQUEST on the feasibility evaluation of measurement and verification option D for energy-saving effect, while its standard operation procedures are thus composed. The case of simulation is of a certain government office building at north Taiwan, with three floors as the basement and 17 floors on the ground. Two different operation flow processes are employed to conduct discussion, and the results show that two different operation flows can, through calculation of computerized simulation, find out the reasonable energy-saving efficiency for the simulation of system improvement. When method 1 is used to measurement and verification option D, it will first collect information needed for input into simulation software. When information is analyzed, results before improvement are input, and it can be conducted of correlation and calibration with actual power consumption after improvement so that Base Line Model can be furnished. Afterward, the equipment and function curve after improvement will be shifted into model, and simulation results with utility conditions after improvement and before equipment improvement can be reached. At the end, simulation results and power expenses bill after improvement are compared to find out the actual energy-saving amount. When method 2 is used to measurement and verification option D, it will first collect information needed for input into simulation software. When information is analyzed, results before improvement are input, and it can be conducted of correlation and calibration with actual power consumption after improvement so that Base Line Model can be furnished. Afterward, the equipment and function curve after improvement will be shifted into model, and simulation results with utility conditions before improvement and after equipment improvement can be reached. At the end, simulation results and power expenses bill before improvement are compared to find out the actual energy-saving amount.