個人桌面領域之基礎研究

The Basic Research of Personal Desktop Territoriality

林玉婷(Yu-Ting Lin)

指導教授 ： 彭瑞玟

國立臺北科技大學/設計學院/創新設計研究所/碩士(2009年)

https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2009.00398

摘要

本研究針不同的桌型的改變及人數的增加是否造成個人空間範圍的改變進行探討。本研究以兩種桌型，分出三種不同的使用形式進行實驗，分別為方桌：90cm×90cm、長桌：90cm×150cm，在長桌方面分為長短兩種邊長進行實驗，因此一共是三種桌型。透過這三種形式的桌型，探討當受測者人數為一人及二人時其個人桌面領域的變化，個人空間範圍到哪裡，及個人空間範圍與非個人空間範圍中的模糊地帶空間的變化為何。受測者平均年齡為26 歲，女性16 名、男性16 名，共32位受測者。透過本次研究得知：個人桌面領域的大小會因桌子的面積大小改變而有所變化，且是隨著桌面增大或縮小的方向進行擴張或縮小；桌子面積的不同，人數的增加使個人桌面領域有縮小的趨勢。個人桌面領域雖會隨著桌子的面積加大而增大，但其增大的範圍到了某個極限後便不在增加。一人與二人個人桌面領域的範圍極限，其左右橫寬約為108cm，縱深約為63cm。

關鍵字

個人空間 ； 領域性 ； 桌子形狀

並列摘要

In this study, we are going to discuss about that if people at family meal changed the scope of personal space by changing the table type. In this case, using two table in three different kinds of situation as test , square table: 90×90cm,: long table 90×150cm, The long table has two type because of the width and length, so there is three table-type. With these three table type we can study about how people change their scope of personal space by changing their desktop area. Subjects were 26 year-old, 16 women, 16 men, a total of 32 subjects. The field of personal desktop
will change with the table size. With the changing of the table, the field grows proportionally. Although the field is growing proportionally, but it will come to it's limit then stop increasing. The limit of the field is about 108cm long, 63cm wide.

並列關鍵字

personal space ； territoriality ； shape table

參考文獻

[2] Andersen. J.F., Andersen, P.A. & Lustig, M.W. (1987) `Opposite Sex Touch Avoidance; A National Replication and Extension', Journal of Nonverbal Behavior11, 228-249.

[5] Altman, I. (1975). Environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, and crowding. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

[6] Argyle, M., & Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance, and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289-304.

[8] Ardery, R. (1966). The territorial imperative. New York: Dell.

[9] Barefoot, J. C., Hoople, H., & McClay, D. (1972). Avoidance of an act which would violate personal space. Psychonomic Science, 23, 205-206.