透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.100
  • 學位論文

《三言》詐騙術類型及其敘事研究

The research of types of fraud and its narrative in the "San Yan "

指導教授 : 陳惠齡

摘要


《三言》為晚明馮夢龍重要的文學著作,亦是研究晚明社會、政治與經濟相當重要的資料。前人對於《三言》的研究多著重於女性意識、人物表現及藝術美學探究等議題。實則晚明商業往來頻繁,經濟發達,在利益掛帥的年代,社會必有不公之處,民有所苦,為圖私利,詐術則應運而生。筆者取材《三言》中以詐騙術為主要發展脈絡的篇章作為研究對象。首先將施騙者與受害者等角色做分類與討論,並取徑敘事學理論,分別以視角與敘述者的探討、環境研究為討論重點,從中分析《三言》詐騙術故事的敘事藝術與特色。因《三言》為當時社會的真實縮影,本文將《三言》詐騙術與晚明社會經濟風氣做映照,並結合社會學理論試論之。結論以晚明的宗教信仰與《三言》詐騙術故事的勸世教化用意為討論議題,盼能以此檢視《三言》詐騙術之時代背景與寫作藝術。

關鍵字

馮夢龍 三言 詐騙 敘事 明代文學

並列摘要


"San-Yan" is not only a important literary work of Feng Meng-long by the late Ming Dynasty, but also the very important research material about the late Ming’s society, politics and economy. In the past, topic of discussion about "San-Yan" focused on female consciousness, character performance, aesthetic inquiry and so on. The commercial exchanges frequently and economy developed well. The society of the late Ming Dynasty came into unfair, and people suffered from bitter. In order to seek personal profits, fraud emerged as the times require. The author focus on the main development thread about fraud from "San-Yan" as the research object about. First, classifies and discusses the roles of scammers and victims, analyzing the perspectives and narrators respectively through the theory of narratology, taking the environmental research as the topic of discussion, analyzing the narrative art and characteristic of the fraud story from "San-Yan". According to the epitome for contemporary society of "San Yan", this artical links and mirrors the "San-Yan" fraud with the social economy and atmosphere of the late Ming Dynasty and made summary. Conclusion with the religious belief in the late Ming Dynasty and the persuasion from the story about fraud of "San-Yan". Looking forward to view the background and writing art of "San Yan" fraud.

參考文獻


6. 林珊妏,〈《杜騙新書》之僧騙故事探究〉,《德霖技術學院通識教育中心—人文暨社會科學期刊》2006年第2卷第2期,頁87-96。
11. 高桂惠,〈世道與末枝—《三言》、《二拍》演述世相與書寫大眾初探〉《漢學研究》2007年第25卷第1期,頁283-312。
17. 黃絢親,〈《三言》中宣傳道教教義的故事〉,〈國立彰化師範大學文學院學報〉,2012年9月第六期,頁135-154。
19. 楊雅琪,〈明代女校書與三言二拍所反映的女子學識教育觀異同檢討〉,《人文與社會學報》2011年第2卷第9期,頁109-135。
21. 趙修霈,〈論馮夢龍「三言」中的「鬧」〉《臺中教育大學學報》2007年卷21第1期,頁85-100。

延伸閱讀