國中導師轉型領導與學生價值觀 關係之研究-以桃園縣為例

A Study of Relationship between Junior High School Advisors’ Transformational Leadership and Students’Values -An Example of Taoyuan County

劉玉薇(Yu-Wei Liu)

指導教授 ： 黃坤錦

中原大學/人文與教育學院/教育研究所/碩士(2008年)

https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2008.00085

摘要

本研究旨在瞭解國中學生知覺的導師轉型領導的運用情形和國中生價值觀的現
況，並探究國中導師轉型領導和其學生價值觀之關係。
本研究採用問卷調查法，以桃園縣公立國中在學的學生為抽樣對象，採分層隨機抽
樣的方式，共抽取十三個鄉鎮市，十七所國中，總計680 位學生為研究樣本，共回收有
效問卷675 份，有效問卷回收率為99.3%。研究工具有研究者自編的「國中學生知覺的
導師轉型領導風格量表」與簡茂發，何榮桂，張景媛（1998）所共同編制的「國中學生
價值觀量表」兩種問卷，所得資料以描述統計分析、t 考驗、單因子變異數分析、Pearson
積差相關分析等統計方法加以處理。所獲致的研究結果歸納如下：
一、國中學生知覺的導師轉型領導之現況：
國中學生知覺的導師轉型領導屬於中上程度的表現，學生感受到的導師轉型領導的
各個層面差異不大。
二、國中生價值觀之現況：
（一）桃園地區國中學生價值觀之現況
桃園地區國中學生在價值觀各個層面重視的程度都介於「重要」與「非常重
要」之間。桃園地區國中學生最重視「道德的」層面的價值觀，最不重視「生
理的」層面的價值觀。
（二）桃園地區國中學生價值觀與常模之比較
1、桃園地區整體國中生的價值觀，在「職業的」與「人生的」兩個面項的表現高
於常模，其餘面項的表現都低於常模。
2、桃園地區國中男生的價值觀，在「職業的」與「人生的」兩個面項的表現高於
常模，其餘面項的表現都低於常模。
3、桃園地區國中女生的價值觀，在「職業的」這個面項的表現高於常模，其餘面
項的表現都低於常模。
ii
三、不同背景變項的導師其轉型領導之差異：
（一）男女導師的轉型領導在各個層面均達顯著差異。
（二）不同年齡層的導師其轉型領導在各個層面均達顯著差異。
（三）不同服務年資的導師其轉型領導的表現在各個層面均達顯著差異。
四、不同背景變項的國中生其價值觀之差異：
（一）男女生在價值觀各面項的重視程度差異不大。
（二）市區與郊區學生的價值觀有顯著差異。
（三）父母親教育程度不同的學生在各層面價值觀的表現無顯著差異。
（四）家庭經濟狀況不同的學生，其部份價值觀的表現有差異。
五、國中學生知覺的導師轉型領導風格與其價值觀之相關性：
國中學生知覺的整體導師轉型領導與其整體價值觀之間除了在「心理的」層面與「願
景規劃」的面項之間；「職業的」與「魅力」、「激勵」、「個人關懷」的面項之間的
相關未達顯著水準之外，其餘各面項之間皆呈顯著的正相關。

關鍵字

國中學生 ； 轉型領導 ； 導師 ； 學生價值觀

並列摘要

The purpose of this study is to find out the current situation of junior high school
advisors’ using transformational leadership and students’ values, and more importantly-the
relationship between them.
The methodology of this research was mainly a questionnaire survey. Samples were
stratified randomly selected from the students of public junior high schools in Taoyuan
County, including 13 administrative areas,17 junior high schools. Totally 680 students were
selected. 675 valid survey questionnaires were returned. The validity was 99.3%.Two scales
were used：“Junior High School Advisors’ Transformational Leadership Styles Scale”,
and“ Students’ Values Scale”. The data were analyzed by various methods of statistic analysis,
including descriptive statistics, independent-sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson
correlation analysis, and scheffe post hoc.
The conclusions of this survey are as the following.
1. The junior high school advisors’ transformational leadership are above average. Students
feel no significant differences among all the aspects of their advisors’ transformational
leadership .
2. （1）The students’ values in Taoyuan County are between “ important ” and
“ very important ”. The highest score is in the aspect of “ moral”；the lowest score is
in the aspect of “physical.”
（2）Except in the aspect of “vocational” and “life ”, the scores of the students’ values in
Taoyuan County are higher than the scores of the norm.
（3）Except in the aspect of “vocational” and “life ”, the scores of the boy students’
values in Taoyuan County are higher than the scores of the norm.
（4）Except in the aspect of “vocational” , the scores of the girl students’ values
in Taoyuan County are higher than the scores of the norm.
3.（1）There are significant differences between male and female in junior high
school advisors’ transformational leadership styles . The female advisors get the
higher score.
（2）There are significant differences among the three groups of different ages.
The advisors who are 31-40 years old get the highest score；the advisors
who are under 30 years old get the lowest score.
（3）There are significant differences among the three groups of different
work years. The advisors who work for over 21 years get the highest
score；the advisors who work for under 10 years get the lowest score.
4. （1）There are no significant differences between boy and girl students’ values.
iv
Boy students regard as important in“ physical”；girl students regard as
important in“ moral.”
（2）The students’ values show significant differences between the students in
the city and in the country. The students in the city regard as more
important in “life,” “ physical,” “psychological ,” and “emotional” than
the students in the country.
（3）The students’ values show no significant differences among different
education levels of their parents.
（4）The students of different family economical circumstances show significant
differences in “social,” “psychological ,” and “ emotional ”.
5. There is a significant positive correlation between the junior high school
advisors’ transformational leadership styles and students’ values, except in
the aspects between “psychological ”and“ vision ”； “vocational,” and
“ charisma, ”“inspiration, ” and “consideration.”

並列關鍵字

advisors ； students’values ； junior high school students

參考文獻

王令瑩（2001）。國民中學學生價值觀念及其相關因素之研究~以高高屏地區國中

王煥琛（2002）。美麗人生－加強青少年價值教育。師友，421，11-15。

李清榮（2004）。高雄市國小教師領導類型、班級氣氛與學習態度之研究。國立

邱彥瑄（2005）。淺談團隊領導理論對教師班級經營之應用與啓示。學校行政,36,

張慶勳（1996）。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能