透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.147.44.253
  • 學位論文

學校建築與社區資源共享之研究─以竹山鎮國民中小學為例

Research on Sharing of School Buildings and Community Resources:A Case Study of Chu-shan Junior and Elementary Schools

指導教授 : 黃世孟
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究以學校建築與社區資源共享為主題,研究以竹山鎮國民中小學與社區為研究對象,採用訪談、觀察與文件分析等方法。根據研究發現,得到以下結論: 一、學校建築與社區資源共享的現況: (一)鄉村型的學校,較常使用社區自然資源,城鎮型的學校,較常使用社區的人為設施與人力資源。 (二)鄉村型與城鎮型的社區,都最常使用學校的室外運動休閒設施。 (三)城鎮型社區使用學校設施頻率高於鄉村型社區,鄉村型學校與社區資源共享主要建立在學校或社區的大型活動。 (四)鄉村型與城鎮型的學校,都致力在結合學校與社區資源。 二、學校建築與社區資源共享的問題: (一)鄉村型學校建築與社區資源共享的問題包括社區資源簡陋缺乏、社區居民對資源共享的觀念不足與社區人口外流嚴重;城鎮型學校建築與社區資源共享的問題包括校方安全衛生顧慮與校方能力意願問題。 (二)學校領導人與社區的公共關係,在鄉村型社區是影響學校與社區資源共享的關鍵因素。 三、學校與社區對資源共享的空間需求: (一)鄉村型與城鎮型社區對學校的空間需求都不高。 (二)鄉村型與城鎮型學校都希望社區能提供與學生學習有關的空間設施。 四、鄉村型學校建築與社區資源共享的策略: (一)強化社區自然與產業資源融入學校教育。 (二)建立以學校教學活動為主軸的社區發展活動。 (三)小型學校功能轉型與硬體設施多目標使用。 五、城鎮型學校建築與社區資源共享的策略: (一)強化社區人力、產業與公共設施資源融入學校教育。 (二)建立學校教學活動與社區活動的連結。 (三)健全學校設施租借與管理的制度。 根據研究發現,提供幾點建議,以供相關單位參考: 一、對鄉鎮學校的建議 (一)建議學校購置交通車。 (二)落實學校設施的規劃與管理。 (三)增加學校人員資源共享的觀念與能力。 (四)學校依社區資源發展不同特色。 (五)加強都市、城鎮與鄉村學校的交流。 二、對政府單位的建議 (一)建立鄉鎮社區人口回流與產業升級的配套措施。 (二)配合財團法人或公益團體等加速推動社區總體營造。 (三)增加學校閒置空間設施的再利用與多用途使用。

並列摘要


This research focused on the sharing of school buildings and community resources. The junior and elementary schools with communities in Chu-shan are the target in the research. The study includes three ways to research: interview, observation, and documentary analysis. According to research discoveries, the study reaches the following conclusions: 1. The sharing situations regarding school buildings and community resources: a. Rural schools use more natural resources. Town schools use more man-made facilities and human resources. b. No matter what kind of community it is, outdoor sports facilities in schools are used more often. c. Town communities use school facilities more often than rural communities. The resource sharing of rural schools with communities lies in large activities held by schools or communities. d. Rural schools and town schools both do their best to connect schools with community resources. 2. The disadvantages produced by the sharing regarding school buildings and community resources are as follows: a. The problems in rural schools mainly come from the communities, including inadequate community resources, lack of the sense of resource sharing, and a more serious outflow of residents in rural communities. The problems in town schools mainly come from the schools, including the consideration of school safety and hygiene, and the willingness with ability of school educators. b. The main factors to influence the share of schools and community resources in rural communities are the school public relations of school leaders and communities. 3. The space demand of resources shared by schools and communities: a. Rural and town communities have less need of space facilities. b. Rural and town schools all hope community can provide space facilities related to students’ learning. 4. The strategies of resources shared by rural schools and communities: a. To combine school’s education with natural and industry resources. b. To establish community development according to school’s teaching activities. c. The function of small schools transforming and multi-purpose usage of school space facilities. 5. The strategies of resources shared by town schools and communities: a. To combine school’s education with the resource of human, industry, and public facilities. b. To make a connection of teaching and community activities. c. To make a complete system of school’s lend-lease and management. According to the findings, the study reaches the following suggestions: 1. Suggestions for rural and town schools: a. Purchase school buses. b. Implement the management of school facilities. c. Advance the knowledge and ability about the resource sharing to the staff. d. Develop into characteristic school according to community resources. e. Increase the interchange of urban school, town schools, and rural schools. 2. Suggestions for the government: a. Take related steps to encourage the migration to rural or town communities and to promote the production. b. Cooperate with the public welfare and non-profit organizations to do community empowering. c. Put idle facilities in schools to reuse and multi-purpose usage.

參考文獻


李 晶(2001b)。國小教師對休閒農場提供資源實施校外教學活動之評估研究。師大學報:教育類,46(1),93-110。
李麗日(1999)。論學校與社區的結合─以「學校社區化、社區學校化」之角度觀之。社會科教育研究,4,183-203。
林勤敏(1986)。學校建築的理論基礎。台北:五南。
張明輝(1999)。學校教育與行政革新研究。台北:師大書苑。
黃世孟、周鼎金(1997)。台北市國民小學教學空間與附屬設施設置基準之調查研究。台北:中華民國建築學會。

被引用紀錄


黃秋美(2012)。新北市學校社區資源整合策略之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2012.00828
尤惠娟(2009)。臺北縣國民小學教師對利用閒置空間推廣高齡教育認知與態度之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2009.00889
曹家瑜(2006)。社區大學與協辦學校共用校園空間之研究 —以台北市社區大學為例〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2006.00498
姜振田(2007)。桃園縣國民中學教師對學校建築滿意度及需求之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0204200815525740
張耿昇(2009)。臺北縣百年小學學校建築與管理之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315164267

延伸閱讀