男性的夫妻角色期待與實踐：親密暴力者vs.無親密暴力者

The Male Adjustment in Couple Role Expectations and Practice: Intimate Partner Violence vs. Non-Intimate Partner Violence

邱獻輝(Hsien-Huei Chiou)

《犯罪學期刊》 16卷2期 (2013/12) Pp. 61-92

摘要

現有研究常以「跨情境」的性別角色期待探究親密暴力議題，此種研究設計忽略不同生活領域有不同性別角色期待，因而可能混淆研究結果。為了更細膩探究此議題，本研究聚焦於親密暴力者與無親密暴力者在「家庭內」的夫妻角色期待／實踐，並思索其與親密暴力的關聯。本研究遵循建構主義典範，邀請親密暴力收容人12位、無親密暴力者10位接受訪談，再以協同方式分析訪談文本。結果共獲得五個主題：夫妻角色期待、角色實踐的協調與僵化、男性角色權力被威脅、男性角色實踐挫敗的因應、對妻子角色實踐的評價。研究者並根據研究結果進行討論。

關鍵字

多元文化 ； 性別角色 ； 建構主義 ； 親密暴力

並列摘要

I found that there are some meanings of gender role duty behind male intimate partner violence (IPV) during my practice. Although there were some related studies, which always explored this issue from the perspective of ”cross-situation” of gender role expectations. This stance is not obligatory as there might be different gender role expectations in different life spaces within the changing Taiwanese society. In order to specify this theme, current research focused on couple role expectations and practices which is known to be a set of beliefs and behaviors within family. This is followed by examining the differences between male IPV and non-IPV. This study adopted constructivism paradigm and recruited 12 wife batterers from the prison and 10 non-IPV males as interviewees. To analyze data, we used open-coding rules of grounded theory and template analysis style. The results can be categorized into five themes: Couple role expectations, Coordination or rigid related to role implementing, Being threatened in male role authority, Dealing with the failure of male role practice, Blaming wife's role practice. Based on these 5 points of view, the interviewed results appear that couple role practice has more meaning within the male intimate partner violence in the current study.

並列關鍵字

Constructivism ； Gender Role ； Intimate Partner Violence ； Multi-Culture

參考文獻

吳柳嬌(2005)。婚姻暴力的成因與處遇之研究(博士論文)。國立中山大學中山學術研究所。

李良哲(1996)。大台北地區已婚者婚姻衝突因應行為之年齡與性別差異研究。教育與心理研究。19，169-196。

利翠珊(1995)。夫妻互動歷程之探討─以台北地區年輕夫婦為例的一項初探性研究。本土心理學研究。4，260-321。

林明傑(2011)。矯正社會工作與諮商。台北:華都。

邱獻輝()。