透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.81.240
  • 期刊

著作權法中的灰姑娘:利用人地位之探討

Cinderella in Copyright Law: Reconsidering the Role of Copyright Users

摘要


著作權法係為平衡著作人利益及社會公共利益而設,而公共利益乃著作利用人權益的集合概念,雖然在著作權法的條文規範中,有許多地方可看出立法者細心維護利用人權益的痕跡,但是由於著作權法的規範方式是先劃出著作人之著作權,再以權利限制、抗辯或例外的方式保留利用人權益,因此使得利用人權益較容易在政策決定過程中被忽視或犧牲,如此的發展趨勢隨著數位科技的進步與著作權保護範圍逐漸擴張而益趨明顯。因此,明確界定利用人及利用行為在著作權制度中的應有位置,實有其必要性。本文首先觀察利用行為與著作權法立法目的之關聯,再點出利用行為於具體規範中之重要性,接著分析著作利用人之類型與利用行為之社會價值,該等價值雖然隱晦,但卻與著作權法促進國家文化發展之立法目的密切相關。本文並以防盜拷措施與合理使用規範之立法及司法實務,具體說明考量利用人權益與否對於著作權政策思維與實踐之實際影響。本文之目的,並不在於建立一套完整的利用人理論,而是希望藉由議題的聚焦,喚起著作權法學術及實務界對於利用人的重視,並確保其在著作權制度中的主體性,以協助建構一個平衡而健全的著作權政策。

並列摘要


The goal of copyright law is not only for private interest but also for public interest. Public interest in copyright law can be viewed as the collective interest of copyright users. Although the legislative intent of protecting users can be found in most of the copyright statutes, users' interests have been occasionally ignored in the copyright policymaking processes. This is partly because the framer of contemporary copyright system chose to first define the copyright scope for owners, and then preserve users' interests as limitations, defenses, or exceptions to copyright. In recent years, users' interests have been furthered sacrificed because of the advance of digital technology and the increasingly strong power posed by the copyright industry. Therefore, it is time to identify the role of copyright users and their behaviors in our copyright system.This article first draws the relationship between users and the goal of copyright law, and then explores how copyright statutes cope with users and their behaviors. Different types of users and their roles in copyright regime are analyzed as well. This article argues that users' behaviors have important social value that is closely related with the legislative goal of copyright. Finally, using technological protection measures and fair use as examples, this article illustrates how considering users will affect the result of copyright policymaking and court decisions. The aim of this article is not to build a perfect theory for copyright users, but to urge policymaker to put more emphasis on copyright users.

參考文獻


李治安(2011)。解構著作權法的損害賠償方程式:以著作財產權之侵害為中心。政大法學評論。124,299-378。
李治安(2012)。合理使用誰的著作?:論合理使用與出處明示之關聯。政大法學評論。126,357-403。
沈宗倫(2009)。論科技保護措施之保護於著作權法下之定性及其合理解釋適用:以檢討我國著作權法第80條之2為中心。臺大法學論叢。38(2),293-369。
林利芝()。
林利芝(2012)。教學講義找麻煩,合理使用費思量:評析智慧財產法院九十九年度刑智上易字第六一號刑事判決。月旦法學雜誌。207,150-175。

被引用紀錄


洪爾謙(2014)。著作權法下管制侵權內容之法律研究 ─以封鎖境外網站為中心〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2014.00439
黃逸平(2013)。同人小說相關著作權法問題之研究-以合理使用為中心〔碩士論文,國立交通大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6842/NCTU.2013.00329
方俊明(2014)。打擊網路盜版之著作權研究—以韓國電影產業為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺北科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2014.00185
許家寧(2017)。論資訊儲存服務中介者著作權法之角色—以音樂著作為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703588
許媏媖(2016)。財稅資訊開放與利用研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201600286

延伸閱讀