體育課不同同儕地位的兒童在社會心理組成上的差異

Differences in Social Psychological Make-Up for Children of Different Peer Status in Physical Education

吳修廷(Hsiu-Tin Wu) ； 廖主民(Chu-Min Liao)

《體育學報》 44卷4期 (2011/12) Pp. 609-622

https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.4404.201112.0908

摘要

目的：檢驗體育課中不同類型同儕地位的兒童在能力信念、樂趣、生理、社會和道德是否有差異。方法：依據Coie與同僚所發展的社會地位分類法，以社會影響力和社會喜愛兩個向度為基礎區分成5種不同類型的同儕地位，分別是受歡迎（popularity）、被拒絕〈rejected）、普通（average）、被忽略（neglected）和受爭議（controversial）5種。研究參與者分別來自臺北市、新北市及臺中市的三個學校四到六年級的學生，每年級各3班共9個班，男生128人、女生101人，共229位（M＝10.99, SD＝1.15）。結果：MANOVA分析結果發現，不同類型同儕地位的兒童在能力期望、生理和社會的自我概念有顯著差異。進一步分別以Dunnett T3和LSD法做事後比較結果發現，在兒童的能力信念方面，受爭議和受歡迎兒童的能力信念顯著高於被忽略的兒童，其他則沒有顯著差異。在生理自我概念方面，受歡迎、被拒絕和普通兒童的生理自我概念顯著高於被忽略的兒童。在社會的自我概念上，受歡迎兒童的社會自我概念顯著高於被拒絕和被忽略的兒童。結論：根據本研究發現，我們除了關注被同儕拒絕的兒童之外，也應多關注被忽略的兒童。

關鍵字

社會地位 ； 同儕關係 ； 能力信念 ； 樂趣自我概念

並列摘要

Purpose: To examine the differences in ability beliefs, enjoyment, and physical, social, and moral self-concepts of children with different peer status in physical education classes. Methods: Participants of this study were 229 students from three primary schools (128 boys, 101 girls, grade 4th to 6th, age M=10.99, SD=1.15) from Taipei, New Taipei and Taichung City of Taiwan. Peer status was assessed by way of peer nomination in which each participant were asked to nominate three classmates he/she liked most (positive nomination) as well as those he/she like least (negative nomination). The sum of the number of positive and negative nominations showed the individual's social impact (SI). On the other hand, the difference of the number of positive and negative nominations showed the individual's social preference (SP). According to Coie and Dodge (1983), five different types of peer status could be identified based on the combinations of different levels of SI and SP, namely, the popular, the rejected, the average, the neglected, and the controversial. Results: MANOVA found that children with different peer status were significantly different in ability expectancy, and physical and social self-concepts. Post-hoc Dunnett T3 and LSDs showed that the popular and the controversial had higher ability beliefs than the neglected. The popular, rejected, and average had higher physical self-concept than the neglected. Finally, in terms of social self-concept, the popular were higher than the rejected and neglected. Conclusion: According to these findings, more attention should be given to not only those who are rejected but also those who are neglected socially in physical education classes.

並列關鍵字

social status ； peer relationship ； ability beliefs ； enjoyment ； self-concepts

參考文獻

李雅芬(2003)。受歡迎與被拒絕兒童社交技巧、生活適應之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所。

林璟玲、林儒君(2009)。混齡班級幼兒同儕互動之研究—以社會計量法爲例。幼兒保育論壇。4，125-143。

林幸臺、張小鳳、陳美光（2003）。田納西自我概念量表指導手冊。臺北市：測驗。

邱皓政(2005)。量化研究法（二）：統計原理與分析技術。臺北市:雙葉書廊。

涂春仁(1996)。Coie & Dodge社會計量地位分類公式之修正。中國測驗學會測驗年刊。43，103-114。