摘要 研究問題導向學習之課程設計 , 以觀察、拍照、紀錄,學習單、課後訪談資料,來深入瞭解師生互動情形和學習者的反應,呈現學生的學習成效與學習歷程。研究結果發現以活動為導向的課程使學習者的認知歷程隨著課程深入有顯著地成長;學習者的情意表現從一開始對學習任務的抗拒與排斥,至最後能夠適應並創作出個人的研究內容;學習者在技能表現上,已能善用手邊的工具與資源蒐集資料並回答研究問題。這充分展現PBL模式的教學有其教學成效。 本研究採準實驗研究法之單一實驗組前後測設計,以桃園縣某國中補習班一年級一個班級學生(共25人)為研究對象,並依之前數學總成績將全班學生以S形分組方式,分成5個異質性學習小組以實施「問題本位學習」教學。 由學生在數學態度量表前後測結果以及教師研究日誌、觀察員觀察紀錄、學習單內容等各項資料進行分析後發現: 問題本位學習的教學策略對學生的數學態度有正面的提昇。學生在數學態度量表的總表及「學習數學的信心」、「數學探究動機」均達顯著差異。 未來實施問題本位學習的教學之建議包括: (一)選擇學校和生活中發生的事件為切入點。 (二)增加學生搜尋資料的時間取代大量的數學練習。 (三)建立討論及發表的機制取代過多的考試。 (四)培養學生發表的能力和自信心。
Abstract From class observation, activities photo taking, video recording, and after-class interviews as well as worksheets, researcher gain in-depth understanding of the students’ performance, social interaction, and response in the process of learning.The results show that students’ cognitive performance grow along the progress of course, and their affective condition change from resistance to adaptation and creation, that their skills performance show they can make the best use of hand tools and resources to collect information to answer research questions. This has fully demonstrated PBL mode has positive effects on teaching and learning. One 25 seventh-grade class of a junior high cram school in Tau-yang country was selected to be the research sample by employing the pre-and-post tests . The S-type grouping method was used to divide these students into five heterogeneous study groups based on the scores of their mathematics examinations . Based on the analysis of the scores of Mathematics Attitude Scale and Metacognition Scale as pretest and post-tests before and after teaching, the teacher’s studying diary, the observer’s recording, and student’s learning sheet, the main findings of this study are as followings: Problem-based learning teaching strategy has the positive promotion to mathematics attitude. Suggestions for using PBL in the future: Chooses the events the school and the life occur for to cut into the spot. Increases the time of materials search instead of doing lots of practices. Establishs the mechanism the discussion publishes instead of more testing. Raises the students’ ability of presentation and of self-confidence.