This paper attempts to demonstrate the incompleteness of the incompleteness of the ”distinction between language and meaning” in wei-chin-hsüan-hsüeh as the dispute concerning whether ”language exhausts meaning”. According to such intepretation, ”language” is but metaphysical discourse, and ”meaning” is but metaphysical truth, Undoubtedly, this metaphysical dimension represents the main stream of the philosophical thought in the Wei and Chin Dynasties, But there is another dimension of the ”distinction between language and meaning,” which is always neglected by the historians of Chinese philosophy, In contrast to the metaphysical one, this dimension envisages ”language” and ”meaning” from a general point of view and places no emphasis on any particular type of language or meaning. Due to such negligence, the views of some important figures of wei-chin-hsüan-hsüeh, namely, Ou-Yang Chian and Chi Kang, on the ”distinction between language and meaning” become incomprehensible. This incomprehensibility of Ou-Yang Chian and Chi Kang's views on language and meaning on one side, and the lights shed on the implications of their views with the introduction of this dimension on the other, together justify my distinction of the two dimensions of this theme in wei-chin-hsüan-hsüeh.