宜蘭縣遊憩區之遊憩效益評估

Evaluation on the Recreation Value of the I-Lan Recreational Sites

陳凱俐(Kai-Lih Chen) ； 林雲雀(Yun-Chieh Lin)

《中華林學季刊》 37卷3期 (2004/09) Pp. 293-302

https://doi.org/10.30064/QJCF.200409.0005

摘要

本文針對參加2002年國際童玩藝術節之遊客進行調查，應用旅遊成本法評估其到宜蘭各類遊憩區旅遊的遊憩效益。
將宜蘭縣遊憩區分為人文藝術類、人工化景觀類、自然景觀類及休閒農業類四類，分別估計四類別樣本之遊憩效益，以平均每人補償變量衡量的遊憩效益結果分別為人文藝術類的474元、人工化景觀類744元、自然景觀類的867元及休閒農業類的689元。
進一步就不同類別遊憩區之遊憩效益進行費雪氏LSD法(Fisher's Least Significant Difference)檢定，結果顯示自然景觀類遊憩效益（平均數為867元）顯著高於人文藝術類遊憩效益（平均數為474元），此二者與人工化景觀類遊憩效益（平均數為744元）或休閒農業類遊憩效益（平均數為689元）彼此之間則皆無顯著性差異。

關鍵字

旅遊成本法 ； 遊憩效益

並列摘要

The visitors of the 2002 International Art Festival held in I-Lan were sampled. Travel cost method (TCM) was applied in this study to estimate the recreation values on various types of recreational sites in I-Lan. Four recreational categories could be distinguished from the characteristics of the recreational sites in I-Lan. They were cultural art, artificial scenery, natural scenery, and recreational agriculture. The recreation values of the four categories were estimated, and were tested via Fisher's Least Significant Difference tests. The recreation values of cultural art, artificial scenery, natural scenery, and recreational agriculture were NT$474, 747, 867, 689, respectively.
Fisher's least significant difference tests showed that the recreation value of natural scenery (with average CV=NT $867) was significantly higher than that of cultural art (with average CV NT $474), and they were not significantly different from that of artificial scenery (with average CV=NT $744) or that of recreational agriculture (with average CV=NT $689).

並列關鍵字

Travel Cost Method ； Recreation Value