Title

宜蘭縣遊憩區之遊憩效益評估

Translated Titles

Evaluation on the Recreation Value of the I-Lan Recreational Sites

DOI

10.30064/QJCF.200409.0005

Authors

陳凱俐(Kai-Lih Chen);林雲雀(Yun-Chieh Lin)

Key Words

旅遊成本法 ; 遊憩效益 ; Travel Cost Method ; Recreation Value

PublicationName

中華林學季刊

Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication

37卷3期(2004 / 09 / 01)

Page #

293 - 302

Content Language

繁體中文

Chinese Abstract

本文針對參加2002年國際童玩藝術節之遊客進行調查,應用旅遊成本法評估其到宜蘭各類遊憩區旅遊的遊憩效益。 將宜蘭縣遊憩區分為人文藝術類、人工化景觀類、自然景觀類及休閒農業類四類,分別估計四類別樣本之遊憩效益,以平均每人補償變量衡量的遊憩效益結果分別為人文藝術類的474元、人工化景觀類744元、自然景觀類的867元及休閒農業類的689元。 進一步就不同類別遊憩區之遊憩效益進行費雪氏LSD法(Fisher's Least Significant Difference)檢定,結果顯示自然景觀類遊憩效益(平均數為867元)顯著高於人文藝術類遊憩效益(平均數為474元),此二者與人工化景觀類遊憩效益(平均數為744元)或休閒農業類遊憩效益(平均數為689元)彼此之間則皆無顯著性差異。

English Abstract

The visitors of the 2002 International Art Festival held in I-Lan were sampled. Travel cost method (TCM) was applied in this study to estimate the recreation values on various types of recreational sites in I-Lan. Four recreational categories could be distinguished from the characteristics of the recreational sites in I-Lan. They were cultural art, artificial scenery, natural scenery, and recreational agriculture. The recreation values of the four categories were estimated, and were tested via Fisher's Least Significant Difference tests. The recreation values of cultural art, artificial scenery, natural scenery, and recreational agriculture were NT$474, 747, 867, 689, respectively. Fisher's least significant difference tests showed that the recreation value of natural scenery (with average CV=NT $867) was significantly higher than that of cultural art (with average CV NT $474), and they were not significantly different from that of artificial scenery (with average CV=NT $744) or that of recreational agriculture (with average CV=NT $689).

Topic Category 生物農學 > 農業
生物農學 > 森林
生物農學 > 畜牧
生物農學 > 漁業
Times Cited
  1. 楊蕙玟(2014)。陽明山花季遊客之遊憩效益評估。中興大學應用經濟學系所學位論文。2014。1-66。 
  2. 李守銘(2012)。新社花海遊憩效益與遊客評價之研究。中興大學應用經濟學系所學位論文。2012。1-113。 
  3. 賴佳儀(2011)。應用旅行成本法評估糖廠之旅遊效益。中興大學應用經濟學系所學位論文。2011。1-43。 
  4. 林琮維(2013)。保安林遊憩效益評估-以台東森林公園為例。臺灣大學森林環境暨資源學研究所學位論文。2013。1-87。 
  5. 廖珮吟(2006)。臺灣主要國家公園遊憩效益評估—旅遊需求體系模型之建構。臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所學位論文。2006。1-22。 
  6. 呂惠富(Huei-Fu Lu)(2013)。國民運動中心經濟價值之評估─假設市場評價法之應用。戶外遊憩研究。26(3)。1-45。 
  7. 張倩斐(2012)。客家節慶活動旅遊效益之研究-以新埔義民節為例。中央大學客家政治經濟研究所學位論文。2012。1-173。
  8. 陳碧玉(2013)。應用旅遊成本法評估國道六號對桃米社區的遊憩經濟效益。朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系學位論文。2013。1-63。