學習回饋形式與品質對學習動機、學習態度、學習調整與自我效能影響之研究

A Study of the Effect of Teachers' Feedback form and Quality on Students' Learning Motivation, Attitude, Adjustment and Self-efficacy

徐明芝(Ming-Chih Hsu)

指導教授 ： 蔡秉燁

淡江大學/教育學院/教育科技學系碩士在職專班/碩士(2015年)

https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00881

摘要

本研究旨在探討教師在國文科給予的回饋形式與回饋品質，對於不同年級、性別的國中生之學習動機、學習態度、學習調整與自我效能之間的影響。相關研究顯示教師給予學生的回饋應持正面鼓勵性質，並採用問卷調查法來實際收集相關資料，研究對象以新竹縣某國中七年級、八年級、九年級學生為主，共發出問卷271份，有效問卷達268份，運用描述性統計、T檢定、單因子變異數分析進行統計資料分析，得到以下結果：
一、背景變項「年級」在「學習動機」構面中的「工作價值」、「自我成效」及「正面情感」均無產生差異。
二、背景變項「年級」在「學習態度」構面中的「學習習慣」、「學習方法」及「環境知覺」均無產生差異。
三、背景變項「年級」在「學習調整」構面中的「認知策略」及「期望調整策略」無產生差異，而在「努力與堅持策略」有差異。
四、背景變項「年級」在「自我效能」構面中的「任務達成」、「精熟經驗」及「學習環境」均無產生差異。
五、背景變項「性別」在「學習動機」構面中的「工作價值」、「自我成效」及「正面情感」均無產生差異。
六、背景變項「性別」在「學習態度」構面中的「學習習慣」、「學習方法」及「環境知覺」均無產生差異。
七、背景變項「性別」在「學習調整」構面中的「認知策略」、「期望調整策略」及「努力與堅持策略」均無產生差異。
八、背景變項「性別」在「自我效能」構面中的「任務達成」、「精熟經驗」及「學習環境」均無產生差異。

依據研究結論，對學校提出若干建議，提供現職的教學者一項參考方向，並作為自身調整教學的一項重要參考資料。

關鍵字

學習回饋 ； 學習動機 ； 學習態度 ； 學習調整 ； 自我效能

並列摘要

This study aims to investigate the influence of teachers’ feedback form and quality in Chinese class on different grades and sexes of junior high school students’ learning motivation, learning attitude, learning adjustment and self-efficacy. Relevant studies evidenced that teachers’ feedbacks for students are required to be positively encouraged. Related data were collected by the questionnaire survey. The participants included the students of Grade Seven, Eight, and Nine from a junior high school in Hsinchu(新竹) County. Two hundred and seventy one copies of questionnaire were delivered with 268 valid responses returned. The data received were statistically analyzed in terms of descriptive statistics, T-test, and One Way ANOVA(Analysis of Variable), which obtained the results as follows:
(1)It presents no difference in “working value,” “self-efficacy,” and “positive affection” in the aspect of “learning motivation” in terms of the background variable, “grade.”
(2)It makes no difference in “learning habit,” “learning method,” and “environmental perception” in the aspect of “learning attitude” in terms of the background variable, “grade.”
(3)It does not show any difference in “cognitive strategy” and “expectancy for strategy regulation,” while shows a difference in “effort and persistence strategy’ in the aspect of “learning adjustment” in terms of the background variable, “grade.”
(4)It has no difference in “task achievement,” “mastery experience ,” and “learning
environment” in the aspect of “self-efficacy’ in terms of the background variable, “grade.”
(5) It presents no difference in “working value,” “self-efficacy,” and “positive affection” in the aspect of “learning motivation” in terms of the background variable, “sex.”
(6) It makes no difference in “learning habit,” “learning method,” and “environmental perception” in the aspect of “learning attitude” in terms of the background variable, “sex.”
(7) It does not show difference in “cognitive strategy,” “expectancy for strategy regulation,” and “effort and persistence strategy” in the aspect of “learning adjustment” in terms of the background variable,“sex.”
(8) It has no difference in “task achievement,” “mastery experience ,” and “learning environment” in the aspect of “self-efficacy” in terms of the background variable, “sex.”

Based on the research conclusion, several implications were proposed for the school in order to provide one direction for current teachers as well as a crucial reference database of teachers’ self-adjustment in teaching.

並列關鍵字

learning feedback ； learning motivation ； learning attitude ； learning adjustment ； self-efficacy

參考文獻

王金國（2001）。成功學習的關鍵~自我調整學習。課程與教學季刊，5（1），145-164。

毛國楠、程炳林（1993）。目標層次與目標導向對大學生自我調整學習歷程之影響。師大教育心理學報，26，85-106。

余鴻穎（2005）。高職學生數學學習困擾與學習態度之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北科技大學，臺北市。

吳家碧（2002）。適當回饋在體育教學上之探討。育達研究叢刊，3，185-190。

洪素蘋、黃宏宇、林珊如（2008）。重要他人回饋影響創意生活經驗：以模式競爭方式檢驗自我效能與動機的中介效果。教育心理學報，40（2），303-322。