兩岸羽球教練培育系統之比較

A comparison of the badminton coach training system on both strait

高嬅(Hua Gao) ； 林靜萍(Ching-Ping Lin)

《中華體育季刊》 31卷1期 (2017/03) Pp. 7-14

https://doi.org/10.3966/102473002017033101002

摘要

本文旨在探討臺灣與中國羽球教練培育系統，研究結果：一、分級制度與負責單位：中國分級較臺灣細膩，兩岸皆落實分層管理制度；二、研習規劃與晉級制度：中國較臺灣審慎周密，研習時間長；中國將繼續教育作為晉級條件，臺灣教練證照採終身制，未建立繼續教育制度；三、申請資格與任職條件：相較臺灣，中國之特色為：（一）高學歷與專業背景要求；（二）重視專業知識理論；（三）重視實務工作經驗；（四）訂定工作績效標準。

關鍵字

繼續教育 ； 崗位培訓 ； 運動教練

並列摘要

This study was to discuss the training system between badminton coaches in Taiwan and China. The results were as the following: 1. The Classification System and The Unit in Charge: The classification system in China was more exquisite than in Taiwan; Both carried out the hierarchical management system; 2. Learning Plan and Promotion System: China's was more thorough than Taiwan's as well as the longer learning time; China took continuing education as the condition of promotion, which Taiwan did not build up. The coach certificate in Taiwan was life-long; 3. The Qualification: Compared to Taiwan: China's features were: (1) highly educated and professional background required; (2) values on expertise and theory; (3) values on working practice and experience; (4) standard of working performance. This study was for domestic badminton coaches' reference of developing education and to provide some suggestions based on the results.

並列關鍵字

continuing education ； job training ； athletic coach

參考文獻

林華韋、廖主民、魏子閎(2003)。運動教練講習會教練培育過程之評析研究─以棒球項目為例。教練科學。2，239-248。

盧心雨(2011)。跳水教練工作經驗與歷程之研究。臺灣運動心理學報。19，1-22。

許馨文(2009)。各級學校專任運動教練之聘任管理。大專體育。101，33-39。

周財勝、張雅棻(2008)。羽球運動教練所具有專業能力之探討。大專體育。99，163-171。

林光宏(2004)。棒球選手與教練之間的認知與互動關係。大專體育。70，27-31。