透過您的圖書館登入
IP:44.199.212.254
  • 期刊

教練威權領導一定不好嗎?一項權變概念的提出與驗證

Does Authoritarian Leadership Lead to Bad Outcomes? A Contingency Perspective

摘要


在運動團隊的相關研究中,教練採取嚴格的控制手段要求選手在訓練中付出努力,是十分常見的現象。過往亦有不少研究者從威權領導的理論觀點切入來探討此一現象,然而,儘管這些研究已累積了初步的研究成果,但多侷限於相似概念的質性訪談,沒有直接以實徵研究來釐清教練威權領導與選手努力行為的關係。因此,對於威權領導是否真的能促使選手付出更多努力,仍缺乏一明確的答案,形成了重要的研究缺口。為了彌補此一缺口,本研究依循雙向度威權領導的概念架構,將之區分為專權領導與尚嚴領導,並從領導權變觀點出發,提出了選手的目標導向作為邊界條件的理論模型。根據348筆大專甲組棒球員的資料顯示,尚嚴領導會提升選手的努力行為;但當選手擁有高逃避表現目標導向或高證明表現目標導向時,此一正向路徑的效果會弱化。另一方面,只有在選手擁有低證明表現目標導向時,專權領導才會對選手的努力行為具有負向預測效果。藉此,本研究釐清了教練的嚴格控制是否會促使選手更加努力,補足過往對此一重要現象缺乏實徵研究的缺口。

並列摘要


Previous studies on the sports team have mainly focused on the common phenomenon that coaches take strict control to require players to work hard in training. Many researchers have explored this phenomenon from the theoretical perspective of authoritarian leadership. Although these studies have accumulated preliminary results, they are mostly limited to qualitative interviews, but not directly examine the relationship between coaches' authoritarian leadership style and players' effort. Therefore, whether the authoritarian leadership can really encourage the players to put more efforts in training is still a puzzle and an important research void. In order to fulfill this void, this study adapts the dual dimensional model of authoritarian leadership, dividing authoritarian leadership into dominance-focus authoritarian leadership and discipline-focus authoritarian leadership. Also, taking the perspective of leadership contingency theory, we propose that player's goal orientation is an important boundary condition. According to the data of 348 college players, discipline-focus authoritarian leadership enhances the player's hard work; and the impact becomes nonsignificant when the player has a high avoid performance goal orientation or a high prove performance goal orientation. On the other hand, dominance-focus authoritarian leadership has a negative impact on the player's hard work behavior only if the player has a low prove performance goal orientation. In this way, this study clarifies whether the strict control of the coach really encourages the players to work harder and fulfill the lack of research in the past for this important phenomenon.

參考文獻


汪在莒、賴文璇(2010):〈教練轉型領導行為對拔河選手成就目標、運動參與動機與組織承諾之結構模式〉。《大專體育學術專刊》,99,452-459 。[Wang, T. C., & Lai, W. S. (2010). Structural equation model of coaches’ transformational leadership behavior on tug of war athletes’ achievement goals, sport motivation and organization commitment. Archives of University Education and Sports, 99, 452-459.] doi:10.6695/AUES.201005_99.0057
蔡英美(2005):〈家長式領導、情緒感受與團隊凝聚力之關係研究〉。《國立體育學院論叢》,16(2),347-358。[Tsai, Y. M. (2005). The relationship among paternalistic leadership, impressing of emotion and group cohesion. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 16(2), 347-358.] doi:10.6591/JPES.2005.09.27
曾秋美、王俊明(2011):〈家長式領導對大專體育科系運動代表隊團隊氣氛及競技倦怠的影響〉。《長榮運動休閒學刊》,5,93-112。[Tseng, C. M., & Wang, C. M. (2011). The effects of paternalistic leadership on team climate and competitive burnout for the college sport representative team in the department of physical education. Zhangrong Yundong Xiuxian Qikan, 5, 93-112.] doi:10.29632/CRYDSSSK.201106.0010
蔡英美、王俊明(2008):〈大專甲組選手知覺的家長式領導、情緒感受、團隊承諾及團隊凝聚力之研究〉。《文化體育學刊》,6,91-99。[Tsai, Y. M., & Wang, C. M. (2008). The study of college athletes’ perceived paternalistic leadership, emotional feeling, organizational commitment and team cohesion. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 6, 91-99.]doi:10.6634/JPSS-CCU.200803.06.17
鄭秀貴、高麗娟(2008):〈威權、仁慈、德行家長式領導:李瑞麟教練之個案研究〉。《北體學報》,16,157-170。[Cheng, H. K., & Kao, L. C. (2008). A case study on Mr. Rei-Lin Lee’s leadership. Tpec Press, 16, 157-170.] doi:10.6167/TPEC/2008.16.15

被引用紀錄


黃義翔、張家銘(2023)。運動情境中威權領導行為之探討嘉大體育健康休閒期刊22(2),93-105。https://doi.org/10.6169%2fNCYUJPEHR.202312_22(2).0006
周婉茹、鄭昱宏(2023)。從西方到東方:教練嚴格要求行為的觀點轉移中華心理學刊65(4),327-352。https://doi.org/10.6129%2fCJP.202312_65(4).0003
高三福、連玉輝、鄭昱宏、鄭伯壎(2020)。轉型領導與家長式領導在運動領導研究的回顧與展望中華心理學刊62(2),267-298。https://doi.org/10.6129%2fCJP.202006_62(2).0008
李庭閣、周婉茹、李啓文、費吳琛(2023)。部屬啊!您有做自己的機會嗎?尚嚴、專權雙元領導與部屬任務績效之關聯性:以情緒調節策略揭開潘朵拉的盒子組織與管理16(2),69-130。https://doi.org/10.53106%2f199687602023081602002
潘緯澄、葛記豪、李伯倫、高三福(2022)。教練二元威權領導與選手心理韌性的關聯:認知信任與情感信任的中介效果大專體育學刊24(4),481-494。https://doi.org/10.5297%2fser.202212_24(4).0004

延伸閱讀