透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.143.244.83
  • 期刊

我國男子選手參加2014與2015年二次世界競技體操錦賽單項成績分值表現比較分析

Comparison and Analysis of Individual Score Performance of the Taipei Men's Team in the 2014 and 2015 World Artistic Gymnastics Championships

摘要


世界競技體操錦標賽是取得奧運會參賽資格的前哨站具有極關鍵的重要性。目的:針對中華臺北男子競技體操選手在2014、2015世錦賽男子團體預賽各單項D分、E分及得分表現進行比較,瞭解各單項分值表現是否有其差異性。方法:經由2014及2015世錦賽官網收集相關分值資料,分值資料透過國家級裁判及中華民國體操協會確認無誤後再進行描述性統計分析。結果:一、地板、鞍馬項目的D分、E分表現出現相反地情況。二、吊環、跳馬項目得分並無顯著提升。三、雙槓項目D分、E分皆有顯著地提升是整體表現最為理想之單項。四、單槓表現最不理想也是唯一D分未達5.0分、得分平均未達13.0分的項目。結論:一、當D分、E分兩者無法同時提升時,單項得分的成長勢必受到侷限。二、雙槓項目C、D級難度動作出現次數有明顯增加,實質提升D分及得分。三、國內選手的單槓專項技術能力與國際選手出現相當大的落差,導致單槓項目成績低落進而影響最終的成隊成績表現。四、以成隊成績為主要考量的情況下,應該優先要求整套動作穩定及動作技術完整,必須避免出現動作失誤減少E分扣分,方能獲得最有利的單項分值、成隊總分及名次。

關鍵字

奧運會 團體預賽 D分 E分

並列摘要


The World Artistic Gymnastics Championships is a very important competition event before entering Olympic Games. Purpose: This Study is to measure the performance of the Chinese Taipei Men's Gymnastics Team in the men's team preliminary rounds of 2014 and 2015 World Artistic Gymnastics Championships. Methods: Through comparing the D and E values and score performances in individual results to determine whether there is any difference in the score performances for each item. The associated individual scores were obtained through the official website of 2014 and 2015 World Artistic Gymnastics Championships. The information was then confirmed with national judges and the Chinese Taipei Gymnastic Association before going through descriptive statistical analysis. Results: (1) On floor and pommel horse, D and E values were contradictory. (2) On rings and vaults, no significant score improvement was found. (3) On parallel bars, there was significant improvement in both D and E values and the overall performance of this section was the best. (4) On horizontal bar, it was the weakest performing item. It was also the only item in which D value has not reached 5.0 and the average score has not reached 13.0. Conclusions: (1) When D and E values cannot be improved simultaneously, the growth of the individual result is bound to be limited. (2) On parallel bars, the number of difficult figures has significantly increased in C and D levels and this can substantially improve D value and scores. (3) These is a big gap between Taipei team members and the international participants in horizontal bar technique, resulting in poor performance in horizontal bar and, thus, affected the final performance of the team. (4) Taking the team result into consideration, priority should be given to the stability of the whole set of movement and the completeness of technique. Shortfall should be avoided to minimize the deductive E value to get the most favorable individual scores and team total score.

並列關鍵字

Olympic games qualification D value E value

參考文獻


方雩、陳光輝、陳智郁(2013)。單槓分腿前迴環經倒立動作訓練方法與應用。運動研究。22(1),35-44。
方雩、陳光輝、陳銘堯(2009)。2007 年全國運動會男子競技體操第III 競賽成績分析。北體學報。17,38-48。
林高正、陳智郁、陳光輝(2017)。世界競技體操錦標賽男子團體競賽成績分析。運動教練科學。45,45-53。
林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市:東華。
陳光輝、王明鴈、高明鋒(2005)。2002 年亞運會與2003 年全運會男子競技體操選手雙槓項目整套動作內容之比較分析。國立體育學院論叢。16(3),305-318。

被引用紀錄


陳智郁、陸康豪、陳光輝(2023)。2020年東京奧運會男子競技體操個人全能賽事D分與E分分值表現探討臺灣體育學術研究(75),69-87。https://doi.org/10.6590/TJSSR.202312_(75).04
林高正、陳光輝、李珍鎬(2021)。2019年世大運臺灣男子競技體操競賽成績分析臺灣體育學術研究(70),31-43。https://doi.org/10.6590/TJSSR.202106_(70).03
林高正、陳光輝、李珍鎬(2020)。國際頂尖男子競技體操選手單項成績表現之比較-以2017、2018及2019年世錦賽為例運動教練科學(59),37-46。https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.202009_(59).0004
林高正(2020)。2019年競技體操世錦賽男子成隊資格賽分值之比較運動教練科學(58),13-23。https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.202006_(58).0002
陳智郁、陳光輝、陸康豪、湯文慈(2021)。2018、2019年世界競技體操錦標賽臺灣選手成績與2020年東京奧林匹克運動會參賽資格的關係大專體育學刊23(3),293-306。https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.202109_23(3).0005

延伸閱讀