透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.221.13.173
  • 期刊

2022年桃園市場候選人的二篇碩士論文爭議

Controversy over Two Master-Degree Dissertations of the 2022 Taoyuan City Mayor Candidate

摘要


針對台灣地區桃園市長候選人論文爭議,高層政治人物指稱「只要是完整看過兩本論文、完整了解事情來龍去脈都願意選擇相信林智堅沒有抄襲。」本文提出不一樣的證據與觀點,說明台灣學術誠信崩壞之事實。本文呼應Chen and Macfaulane(2016)主張:唯一可以挽回華人社會敗壞學術習性的作法,是對學術舞弊習性進行公開的討論與挑戰。

並列摘要


In response to the dispute over the two dissertations of the Taoyuan City Mayor candidate, the highest politician claimed that "anyone having examined the two papers completely and fully understood the ins and outs of the event, he is willing to choose to believe that Lin Chih-Chien did not plagiarize." This article expresses different viewpoints and illustrates the collapse of academic integrity in Taiwan. The author echoes Chen and Macfaulane (2016)'s claim that the only way to restore academic ethics in Chinese society is to openly discuss and challenge academic fraud habits. academic integrity malpractices are openly discussed and challenged.

參考文獻


劉任昌(2017)。評論藍迪斯新國富論中譯本。科學與人文研究,4(3),44-56。Liu, J.C. (2017b). A Critique on the Chinese Translation of Landes' the Wealth and Poverty of Nations. Journal of Sciences & Humanities, 4(3), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.6535/JSH2017074302
劉任昌(2021)。評論40篇臺灣學者發布於國際期刊的數據相似論文。科學與人文研究,9(1),80-223。https://doi.org/10.6535/JSH.202111_9(1).0005
劉任昌(2022)。新聞採訪錄製影音著作的著作權議題。科學與人文研究,9(3),1-13。https://doi.org/10.6535/JSH.202205_9(3).0001
Chen, S. & Macfaulane, B. (2016) Academic integrity in China', in T. Bretag (Eds.): Handbook of Academic Integrity, 99-105, Springer Science + Business Media Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_32
Naor, J. (1982). A new approach to multinational social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 1, 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382774

被引用紀錄


劉任昌(2023)。關貿網路公司董事長2011年博士論文研究數據疑點之分析科學與人文研究11(1),1-50。https://doi.org/10.6535/JSH.202309_11(1).0001
劉任昌(2023)。元智大學2008年碩士論文與國立臺北大學2011年博士論文研究結果重疊的個案研究科學與人文研究10(4),137-151。https://doi.org/10.6535/JSH.202308_10(4).0008

延伸閱讀