藝術與人文學習領域素養指標實施成效之研究－以桃園縣國中小為例

A Study on the Effectiveness of Arts and Humanities Learning Area Literacy Indicators-A Case Study of Elementary and Junior High Schools in Taoyuan County

張慧如(Hui-Ju Chang)

指導教授 ： 林劭仁

國立臺北藝術大學/文化資源學院學術論文/藝術與人文教育研究所/碩士(2012年)

https://doi.org/10.6835/TNUA.2012.00003

摘要

本研究旨在調查桃園縣國民中小學藝術與人文學習領域基本素養指標目前實施的情形，以教師個人背景作變項，探討不同背景變項的教師對藝術與人文學習領域基本素養指標實施現況看法之差異情形。
根據研究目的，收集與分析相關文獻資料，綜合歸納後，編製「桃園縣國民中小學藝術與人文學習領域基本素養指標實施成效之研究問卷」為測試工具，以桃園縣國中小藝術與人文教師為研究對象，並輔以訪談，瞭解桃園縣學校推動藝術與人文學習領域素養指標之現況與藝術與人文學習領域素養指標績優標竿學校之推動情形與特色，並探討桃園縣學校藝術與人文教師對藝術與人文學習領域素養指標之看法。本研究獲致之發現與結論如下：
一、推動的方式主要是由學校鼓勵教師實施，參與人員以學校行政人員及藝術與人
文領域教師為主。
二、學校發展的整體特色主要是安排豐富藝文活動讓學生進行藝術欣賞，著重培養
學生的藝術表現能力。
三、藝術與人文教師以自編教材教科書並用的方式來設計符合學生藝術學習能力的
課程；評量方式以實作為主，著重學生的對藝術與人文課程的學習態度。
四、受訪教師對素養指標內容達成之難易程度之看法介於「中等」與「中上」程度
，會因性別、學校規模、服務年資、職務、最高學歷、是否曾參與藝術與人文
素養指標相關研習、學校類別不同有顯著差異。
五、受訪教師對素養指標實施成效認同程度介於「中等」與「 中上 」程度，會因
性別、職務、最高學歷、是否曾擔任課程發展委員會委員不同有顯著差異。
根據以上研究結果提出具體建議，供教育行政機關、學校教育人員與未來研究者參考。

關鍵字

藝術教育、藝術與人文、素養指標

並列摘要

This study aims to investigate the implementation status on Arts and Humanities Learning Area Literacy Indicators of Elementary and Junior High Schools in Taoyuan County. It takes teachers’ background as variables and purports to study the difference of view of Literacy Indicators implementation status on teachers’ different background.

It establishes the “questionnaire of Arts and Humanities Learning Area Literacy Indicators implementation effectiveness of Elementary and Junior High Schools in Taoyuan County” as test tools after collecting and analyzing relevant literatures ,and allocates some interviews from Arts and Humanities teachers of Elementary and Junior High schools in Taoyuan County. In addition to investigating the implementation status of Arts and Humanities Learning Area Literacy Indicators, it also purports to study the promotion situations and characteristics of model schools and understand the viewpoints of Arts and Humanities Learning Area Literacy Indicators from Arts and Humanities teachers of Elementary and Junior High schools in Taoyuan County. The results and conclusions show (1) The major promotion way is by encouraging teachers from schools and the major participants are school administrators and Arts and Humanities teachers. (2) The major general characteristics of school development are Arts appreciation by arranging plentiful Arts activities and focusing on cultivating Arts performance capabilities of students. (3) Arts and Humanities teachers design the curriculums which meet students’ Art learning ability by using textbooks and materials prepared by teachers. The major evaluation methods are on practice and operation and emphasize the learning attitude of Arts and Humanities curriculums from students. (4) The viewpoints of reach level on Literacy Indicators from surveyed teachers are between "moderate" and "upper" and have significantly difference because of gender, school size, years of service, job position, the highest level of education, study experience of Humanities Literacy Indicators and school type. (5) The acceptance levels of implementation effectiveness on Literacy Indicators from surveyed teachers are between "moderate" and "upper" and have significantly difference because of gender, job position, the highest level of education and the experience of being a member at Curriculum Development Committee.

There are some specific recommendations from this study and hope those are helpful to education organizations, school administrators and future researchers.

並列關鍵字

Arts Education, Arts and Humanities, Literacy Indicators

參考文獻

教育部（民94a）。國民中小學藝術與人文學習領域基本素養指標解說手冊。

郭榮瑞（民95）。藝術與人文學習領域素養指標的商榷。國教新知，4，1-15。

曾瑞媛、許哲彬（民96）。組織你的想法、分享你的創意：探討DanceForms運用於舞蹈創作之功能。北商學報，15，359-370。

詹淑妃（民96）。桃園縣國民小學學校本位課程評鑑實施現況之研究（未出版碩士論文）。中原大學，桃園縣。

劉雅文（民98）。創作舞蹈基本元素應用於舞蹈教學之研究。北商學報，16，183-194