本研究的主要目的在探討不同性別、教師類別、特教教師類別、特殊體育經驗和學校地區之國中教師對特殊體育的態度的差異情形,並綜合本研究結論,提出未來實施特殊體育之建議。 本研究的研究方法採問卷調查法。研究對象取自台灣省、台北市和高雄市的特殊學校和附設有特殊班的普通學校共347 間,每一所學校抽取體育教師兩名和特教教師兩名(若特教班有兩類以上,則每類各抽一名),有效樣本共860 位國中現任教師,以研究者自編之『國中教師對特殊體育之意見調查問卷』施測,所得資料以平均數、標準差、相關和MANOVA等統計方法進行處理。 本研究之結論臚列於下: 性別方面: 『對特殊體育的推行態度』,女性教師比男性教師積極。 教師類別方面: 『對特殊體育的價值態度』,體育教師比特教教師積極。 特教教師類別方面: 啟智類教師、啟聰類教師和其他類教師『對特殊體育的態度』並無顯著的差異存在。 特殊體育經驗方面: 『對特殊體育的適性教學態度』、『對特殊體育的價值態度』和『對特殊體育的安 置態度』,都是有特殊體育經驗的教師比無特殊體育經驗的教師積極。 學校地區方面: 『對特殊體育的推行態度』,鄉村地區教師比城市地區教師積極。
The main purpose of this study was to inquire deviation of different genders, categories of teachers, categories of special education teachers, special physical education experiences and school areas of junior high school teachers attitude toward special physical education. Then synthesize the conclusions of study and propose some suggestions for the future implementations of special physical education. The research methodology of the questionnaire investigation were utilized to gather data for the study. The subjects of the research came from 347 special education schools and normal junior high schools which were with special education classes in Taiwan province, Taipei city and Kaohsiung city. Two physical education teachers and two special education teachers were sampled in each sample school. When categories of special education were above two, one teacher of each category was sampled. The survey instrument ‘Investigation questionaire of junior high school teacher’s opinions toward special physical education’ developed by researcher was used. The valid samples consist of 860 teachers. Means, standard deviation, correlation and MANOVA were used to test significant difference. The conclusions made in this study included: 1.For the variables of genders, female teachers possessed more positive attitude than male teachers in the attitude toward the implementation of special physical education. 2.For the categories of teachers, physical education teachers possessed more positive attitude than special education teachers in the attitude toward the value of special physical education. 3.For the categories of special education teachers, mentally retarded students’ teachers, hearing handicap students’ teachers and other handicap categories students’ teachers had no difference in the attitude toward special physical education. 4.For the experiences of special physical education, teachers with special physical education experiences were more positive than teachers without special physical education in the attitude toward the adapted instruction of special physical education, the attitude toward the value of special physical education and the attitude toward the placement of special physical education. 5.For school areas, teachers in country school areas were more positive than teachers in city school areas in the attitude toward the implementation of special physical education.