透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.224.39.74
  • 期刊

跆拳道優秀選手與大專生運動視覺之比較

A Comparison Study of Sports Vision between Elite Taekwondo Contestants and University Student Athletes

摘要


Purpose: Compare the peripheral awareness (PA), eye movement (EM), momentary vision (MV) and dynamic visual acuity (DVA) of elite Taekwondo contestants and university student athletes. Methods: 15male elite athletic students Taekwondo contestants and university students were recruited, and the improved version of Athlevision of sports vision measurement tool was used. The Mann-Whitney test is used, level of significance is α = .05. Results: PA: Taekwondo contestants group (TCG) (5.29 ± 0.63cm) was relatively better than university students group (USG) (4.73 ± 0.92 cm) (z = -2.189; p = .029). In DVA (up, down, left, and right): TCG was 84.87 ± 21.33 ms, and USG was 87.96 ± 14.53ms. EM: TCG was 13.5 ± 1.60ms, and USG was 14.80 ± 3.61ms. MV: TCG was 27.61 ± 9.66ms, and USG was 24.03 ± 12.15ms. The DVA, EM, and MV were no significant different between two groups (p > .05). Conclusion: The performance of TCG in peripheral awareness was relatively better than USG. The finding may provide Taekwondo coach and researchers understand that the individual difference in the ability and reference to indentify (PA, EM, MV, and DVA) in Taekwondo sports.

並列摘要


Purpose: Compare the peripheral awareness (PA), eye movement (EM), momentary vision (MV) and dynamic visual acuity (DVA) of elite Taekwondo contestants and university student athletes. Methods: 15male elite athletic students Taekwondo contestants and university students were recruited, and the improved version of Athlevision of sports vision measurement tool was used. The Mann-Whitney test is used, level of significance is α = .05. Results: PA: Taekwondo contestants group (TCG) (5.29 ± 0.63cm) was relatively better than university students group (USG) (4.73 ± 0.92 cm) (z = -2.189; p = .029). In DVA (up, down, left, and right): TCG was 84.87 ± 21.33 ms, and USG was 87.96 ± 14.53ms. EM: TCG was 13.5 ± 1.60ms, and USG was 14.80 ± 3.61ms. MV: TCG was 27.61 ± 9.66ms, and USG was 24.03 ± 12.15ms. The DVA, EM, and MV were no significant different between two groups (p > .05). Conclusion: The performance of TCG in peripheral awareness was relatively better than USG. The finding may provide Taekwondo coach and researchers understand that the individual difference in the ability and reference to indentify (PA, EM, MV, and DVA) in Taekwondo sports.

參考文獻


林宜親、李冠慧、宋玟欣、柯華葳、曾志朗、洪蘭、阮啟弘(2011)。以認知神經科學取向探討兒童注意力的發展和學習之關聯。教育心理學報。42(3),517-541。
林明聲(1999)。運動視覺訓練法。臺南市:信宏。
陳俊汕(2005)。運動視覺與選擇性注意的機轉及其在運動上的應用。大專體育。78,200-209。
彭譯箴、李雲光(2005)。籃球選手與大專生深度知覺之比較研究。北體學報。13,88-95。
彭譯箴、李雲光、謝素貞(2006)。不同種類運動選手深度知覺之比較研究。大專體育學刊。8(3),89-98。

被引用紀錄


陳昱仁、寧玉麟、史麗珠、張世聰、劉妍秀(2019)。6週空手道訓練對10-11歲孩童深度知覺與周邊視覺之成效運動教練科學(55),21-30。https://doi.org/10.6194/SCS.201909_(55).0003

延伸閱讀