透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.12.161.77
  • 期刊

土牛、番界、隘勇線:劃界與劃線

Tu-niu Ditch、Aboriginal Boundary、Defense Line of Frontier Gourd: Demarcation and Lineation

摘要


在台灣開拓史的過程中,漢人移民社會與台灣原住民族群間的互動不僅在經濟生活的交換層面,同時也有武裝衝突與戰爭態勢。從早期的土牛溝,建立所謂的「番界」,而直至清末日治初期的隘勇線,無論是處在哪一種型態下,有具體工事而劃定了界線,也有在界線之際進行的各種活動。但在不同地區與社會型態中,在不同認知與認定的情形下,界線的意涵不僅爲具體的工事,同時因文化差異而形塑出一條看不到的線,在歷史與社會的過程中進行各種重構與變化。因此界線的變化不僅指涉是一種勢力的消長,它也進行了認定的工作,同時也讓雙邊的各種活動進行了修正。界線的劃定後產生了防禦或是攻擊的向度,在空間上藉由「界線」逐步的「山地變平地,後山變前山」。而在社會的意義上,也從將「生番變熟番、熟番變漢人」,這些都回頭引發了界線的重構與再認定。「劃線」又再一次成爲一股推進的動力,驅動了人越界的慾望,使界線內外的人們有了行動上的依據,在所謂的跨界、拓邊與包圍的過程中不斷地循環。 本文主要關心的是透過「劃界與劃線」這組概念,如何在這一條界線的歷史過程中,在各種的時代背景上,產生了什麼樣的作用?並且在不同的社會因素下,又是如何看待這條界線?希望透過一個歷史社會學的角度,重新思考今日台灣原住民的現代性形構是如何開展進行初步的探討。

關鍵字

土牛 番界 隘勇線 劃界與劃線 現代性

並列摘要


In the development history of Taiwan, interactions between the Han Chinese and Taiwan's aborigine groups were not only on the economic level but also armed conflicts and wars. From the Tu-niu Ditch in the early period to the so-called ”Defense Line of Frontier Guard” by the end of the Ching Dynasty and early Japanese colonization period, aboriginal land boundaries of various modes have served concrete boundary purposes. There have also been different kinds of activities along these borderlines. However, boundaries are significant not just in concrete terms. In different areas and social modes, and because of different perceptions and designations, disparities have often resulted in the formation of an invisible line, which underwent change and re-constructed in the course of historical and social progress. Thus, changes in demarcations not only refer to shift of power, they also serve the purpose of making definitions, and lead to revisions in various types of activities of both sides. The drawing of demarcations created the dimension of defenses and attacks. In terms of space, demarcations were gradually moved, such as ”mountain lands into flat lands, from rear to front sides of mountains.” In sociological terms, ”rough savages turned into tamed savages, and then the tamed savages assimilated into the Han populace.” All these reflect the re-structuring and redefining of boundaries. Demarcations became a driving force that aroused people's desire to cross boundaries, while also serving as a reference point for people's actions on both sides. They continued to get involved in a circulating process of crossing borders, encroachment and encirclement. This paper attempts to investigate how the concept of ”demarcation and lineation” has functioned in this historical process in different historical settings and how the boundary has been viewed by different social factors. This study also aims to re-evaluate the modern formation of contemporary Taiwanese aborigine from the perspectives of historical sociology.

參考文獻


王世慶(1957)。台灣隘制考。台灣文獻。7(3/4),33-42。
王嵩山(2001)。台灣原住民的社會與文化。台北:聯經。
王梅霞(2003)。從gaga的多義性看泰雅族的社會性質。臺灣人類學刊。1(1)
王學新、龍仕騰()。
中央研究院民族所編譯(1996)。番族慣習調查報告書第一卷:泰雅族。台北:中研院民族所。

被引用紀錄


洪梓恩(2014)。保全在台灣─都市社會中的信任與使用者詮釋〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2014.00066
許惠靈(2015)。流動的邊界,隱沒歷史的再現:「土牛溝」楊梅段地景敘事研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201500683
徐榮春(2010)。1924馬武督,泰雅人的土地變遷經驗與gaga對話〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0016-1901201111415130
賴恆毅(2012)。清代臺灣地理空間書寫與文化敘事〔博士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613531359
林柑萍(2013)。日治時期大溪社頭與彩牌之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2801201316182300

延伸閱讀