Translated Titles

Establishment of A Sustainability Balanced Scorecard-Example of Semiconductor Industry in Taiwan





Key Words

永續性平衡計分卡 ; 模糊德爾菲法 ; 分析網路程序法 ; 半導體產業 ; Sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) ; Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) ; Analytic Network Process (ANP) ; Semi-conductor industry



Volume or Term/Year and Month of Publication


Academic Degree Category




Content Language


Chinese Abstract

近年來,全球永續發展意識不斷高漲,市場價值已由財務考量的單一層面轉變為整合經濟、環境與社會面向的三重盈餘績效(Triple Bottom Line, TBL)。傳統平衡計分卡(Balanced Scorecard, BSC)被企業視為強化經營績效的關鍵工具,然而卻缺乏考量環境與社會層面,致使其無法作為企業永續績效的決策工具。目前國外雖有一些結合平衡計分卡與永續績效的相關研究,但大多缺乏運用科學方法來呈現具系統化的架構,反觀國內更僅只有少數著重於環境面平衡計分卡的研究,對於廣泛永續性議題的考量仍顯不足。有鑑於此,本研究首先透過廣泛文獻回顧與探討,將經濟、環境與社會面議題整合,並加入「永續性」及「利害關係人」的觀點,初步設計永續性、內部流程、利害關係人,與學習成長等四大構面,以及40項量度的『永續性平衡計分卡(Sustainability BSC, SBSC)』評估架構,接著以半導體業為研究對象,藉由模糊德爾菲法(Fuzzy Delphi Method)篩選出適用於半導體產業之25項量度。最後,為了考量各量度之間相依與回饋的關係,本研究以分析網路程序法(Analytic Network Process, ANP)來計算與制定各量度之相對權重。研究結果顯示,前5個最重要的量度分別為:「獲利能力」(0.2528)、「綠色創新或技術投資」(0.1563)、「企業綠色形象」(0.1546)、「顧客滿意度」(0.0799)及「高階主管永續認知與態度」(0.0516),其中前三名皆為永續性構面之量度,佔總權重的56%之多,更突顯三重盈餘績效的重要性。本研究期望透過此永續決策工具的建置,協助企業衡量組織永續績效的良窳,使決策者得以研擬永續管理策略,提升企業永續競爭優勢。

English Abstract

With increased sustainable development awareness, current market values have changed from financial performance to triple bottom line (TBL) performance. The conventional balanced scorecard (BSC) plays a crucial role in enhancing business performance, but it does not fully consider environmental and social aspects, the BSC is a poor decision-making tool for sustainability. This study attempts to establish a sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) for Taiwanese semi-conductor industry for executing characteristics analysis. The SBSC is constructed by integrating economic, social and environmental aspects into the existing four perspectives of the conventional balanced scorecard, and then restructuring the financial and customer perspectives to the sustainability and stakeholder perspectives in order to improve the shortfall of the conventional BSC in measuring the corporate sustainability assessment. The Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) together with the Analytic Network Process (ANP) is applied to construct a SBSC framework with 4 perspectives and 25 measures and to obtain the weightings of different sustainability measures. The results indicate that the most important 5 measures are capability of gaining profitability (0.2528), green innovation and investment (0.1563), green image (0.1546), curstomer satisfaction (0.0799), and sustainability awareness of top management (0.0516). Among these measures, Top three of them are all in the sustainability perspective, which consists of 56% of the overall weighting. It is anticipated that the proposed SBSC is able to assist Taiwanese companies to enhance their competitiveness in this sustainability era.

Topic Category 工程學院 > 環境工程與管理研究所
工程學 > 土木與建築工程
  1. [8]Elkington, J., Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business, Oxford, UK: Capstone, 1997.
  2. [9]Epstein, M. J., Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance: Best Practices for Costing and Managing an Effective Environmental Strategy, Irwin: Chicago, IL, 1996.
  3. [13]Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P., Balanced Scorecard: Strategien erfolgreich umsetzen, Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, 1997.
  4. [14]Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P., The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
  5. [15]Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P., The Strategy-Focused Organization: how Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, MA, 2001.
  6. [16]Leipziger, D., The Corporate Social Responsibility Code Book, Greenleaf: Sheffield, 2003.
  7. [18]Romm, J. J., Cool companies—How the best businesses boost profits and productivity by cutting greenhouse gas emissions, London: Earthscan, 1999.
  8. [19]Saaty, T. L., The analytic hierarchy process, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  9. [21]Schaltegger, S. and Burritt, R., Contemporary Environmental Accounting: Issues, Concepts and Practice, Greenleaf: Sheffield, 2000.
  10. [25]Wagner, M., A Review of Empirical Studies Concerning the Relationship Between Environmental and Economic Performance, Lüneburg: Center for Sustainability Management, 2001.
  11. [30]Burke, L. and Logsdon, J. M., "How corporate social responsibility pays off," Long Range Planning, vol. 29, no. 4, 1996, pp. 495-502.
  12. [31]Dias-Sardinha, I., Reijnders, L. and Antunes, P., "From Environmental Performance Evaluation to Eco-Efficiency and Sustainability Balanced Scorecards," Environmental Quality Management, vol. 12, no. 2, 2002, pp. 51-64.
  13. [33]Epstein, M. J. and Wisner, P. S., "Using a Balanced Scorecard to Implement Sustainability," Environmental Quality Management, vol. 11, no. 2, 2001, pp. 1-10.
  14. [34]Erdogmus, S., Aras, H. and Koc, E., "Evaluation of alternative fuels for residential heating in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision-making." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 10, 2006, pp. 269-279.
  15. [35]Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger S. and Wagner, M., "The sustainability balanced scorecard - Linking sustainability management to business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 11, no. 5, 2002, pp. 269-284.
  16. [36]Griffin, J. and Mahon, J., "The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty five years of incomparable research," Business and Society, vol. 36, no. 1, 1997, pp. 5-31.
  17. [37]Huang, J. J., Tzeng, G. H. and Ong, C. S., "Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process," Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 26, 2005, pp. 755-767.
  18. [38]Hubbard, G., "Measuring Organizational Performance-Beyond the Triple Bottom Line," Business Strategy and the Environment, in press., 2006.
  19. [39]Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, T., Tamizawa, G., Totsuta, R. and Mieno, H., "The Max-Min Delphi Method and Fuzzy Delphi Method via Fuzzy Integration," Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 55, 1993, pp. 241-253.
  20. [40]Jharkharia, S. and Shankar, R., "Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach," Omega, vol. 35, 2007, pp. 274-289.
  21. [41]Kahraman, C., Ertay, T. and Buyukozkan, G., "A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 171, 2006, pp. 390-411.
  22. [43]Lee, J. W. and Kim, S. H., "Using ANP and GP for interdependent information system project selection," Computers & Operations Research, vol. 27, 2000, pp. 367-382.
  23. [45]Möller, A. and Schaltegger, S., "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard as a Framework for Eco-efficiency Analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 9, no. 4, 2005, pp. 73-83.
  24. [46]Pava, M. and Krausz, J., "The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance: the paradox of social cost," Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 15, 1996, pp. 321-357.
  25. [47]Robert, K., "Tools and concepts for sustainable development: how do they relate to a general framework for sustainable development, and to each other," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 8, 2000, pp. 243-254.
  26. [48]Robins, F., "The future of corporate social responsibility," Asian Business and Management, vol. 4, 2005, pp. 95-115.
  27. [49]Saaty, T. L. and Takizawa, M., "Dependence and independence: from linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 26, 1986, pp. 229-237.
  28. [50]Schaltegger, S. and Synnestvedt, T., "The link between ‘green’ and economic success. Environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance," Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 65, no. 4, 2002, pp. 339-346.
  29. [52]Wolfslehner, B., Vacik, H. and Lexer, M. J., "Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management," Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 207, 2005, pp. 157-170.
  30. [53]Wu, W. W. and Lee, Y. T., "Selecting knowledge management strategies by using the analytic network process," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 32, 2007, pp. 841-847.
  31. [54]Zadeh, L. A., "Fuzzy Sets," Information and Control, vol. 8, 1965, pp. 338-353.
  32. [55]胡憲倫、程大哲、許家偉,「半導體產業之永續性平衡計分卡建構初探」,2007國際企業管理跨領域整合學術研討會,花蓮,2007。
  33. [56]胡憲倫、程大哲、許家偉,「應用模糊德爾菲法建構永續性平衡計分卡-以半導體產業為例」,2008華人經濟圈企業競爭力與經營管理學術研討會,新竹,2008。
  34. [58]Dyllick, T. and Hamschmidt, J., "Wirksamkeit und Leistung von Umweltmanagementsystemen," Eine Untersuchung von ISO 14001-zertifizierten Unternehmen in der Schweiz, Zürich, 2000.
  35. [64]李澤育,國民小學校園環境健康評估因子之研究-以台南市國民小學為例,碩士論文,國立成功大學建築研究所,台北,2006。
  36. [69]黃文怡,運用平衡計分卡協助企業環境績效評估與環境策略管理,碩士論文,國立成功大學資源工程系,台南,2005。
  37. [71]趙炯皓,WEEE回收系統選擇決策模式之研究,碩士論文,國立台北科技大學商業自動化與管理研究所,台北,2007。
  38. [73]陳虹遐,應用分析網路程序法於液晶電視之生態效益評估,碩士論文,國立成功大學工業設計研究所,台南,2004。
  39. [77]衛萬里,應用分析網路程序法選擇最佳產品設計方案之決策分析模式,博士論文,國立台灣科技大學設計研究所,台北,2007。
  40. [81]British Standards Institution (BSI), The SIGMA project: Sustainability in practice, AccountAbility & Forum for the Future, 2001. http://www.projectsigma.com/.
  41. [82]Epstein, M. J. and Birchard, B., Applying the balanced scorecard. Management Accounting Guideline, Society of Management Accountants of Canada, 1999.
  42. 書籍
  43. [1]李允中、王小璠、蘇木春,模糊理論及其應用,台北:全華科技圖書股份有限公司,2003。
  44. [2]張有恆,運輸計劃評估與決策-模糊理論之探討與應用,台北:華泰書局出版,1998。
  45. [3]朱道凱 譯,平衡計分卡:資訊時代的策略管理工具,台北:臉譜出版、城邦文化發行,1999。譯自R. S. Kaplan & D. P. Norton(1996)。
  46. [4]王欽輝等編譯,FUZZY 工學,台北:全華科技圖書公司,1992。
  47. [5]Deegen, T., Ansatzpunkte zur Integration von Umweltaspekten in die"Balanced Scorecard", Lüneburg: Center for Sustainability Management, 2001.
  48. [6]Drucker, P., Management—Tasks, responsibilities, practices, Oxford: Butterworth – Heinemann, 1999.
  49. [7]Eilon, S., Management strategies—A critique of theories and practices, Norwell: Kluwer Academic, MA, 1999.
  50. [10]Figge, F. and Schaltegger, S., What is ‘Stakeholder Value’? Developing a Catchphrase into a Benchmarking Tool, Lüneburg: University of Lüneburg and Bank Pictet in association with UNEP, 2000.
  51. [11]Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M., Sustainability Balanced Scorecard, Wertorientiertes Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement mit der Balanced Scorecard, Lüneburg: Center for Sustainability Management, 2001a.
  52. [12]Hubbard, G., Strategic Management: Thinking, Analysis and Action, 2nd edn, Ch 5, Frenchs Forest: Pearson, 2004.
  53. [17]Niven, P. R., Balanced Scorecard Step by Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
  54. [20]Saaty, T. L., The analytic network process, Expert Choice, Inc., Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 1996.
  55. [22]Schaltegger, S. and Dyllick, T., eds., Nachhaltig managen mit der Balanced Scorecard (Sustainability Management Using the Balanced Scorecard), Wiesbaden: Gabler, 2002.
  56. [23]Schaltegger, S. and Figge, F., Environmental Shareholder Value, Basel: WWZ and Bank Sarasin, 1997.
  57. [24]Sturm, A., Performance Measurement und Environmental Performance Measurement – Entwicklung eines Controllingmodells zur unternehmensinternen Messung der betrieblichen Umweltleistung, Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Technischen Universität Dresden: Dresden, 2000.
  58. 期刊論文
  59. [26]鄧振源、曾國雄,「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用」,中國統計學報,第二十七卷,第七期,1989,第1-20頁。
  60. [27]胡憲倫、鍾啟賢,「企業永續績效評估-永續企業的八大修煉」,永續產業發展雙月刊,第十四期,2004,第9-19頁。
  61. [28]陳昭宏,「亞太港埠競爭力與核心能力指標之研究」,運輸學刊,第十三卷,第一期,2001,第1-25頁。
  62. [29]吳思華、沈榮欽,「台灣積體電路產業的發展與形成」,台灣產業研究,第一卷,第一期,1999,第57-150頁。
  63. [32]Epstein, M. J. and Manzoni, J. F., "Implementing corporate strategy: From tableau de bord to balanced scorecard," European Management Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, 1998, pp. 190-203.
  64. [42]Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P., "The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance," Harvard Business Review, vol. 70, no. 1, 1992, pp. 71-79.
  65. [44]Liu, E. and Hsiao, S.W., "ANP-GP approach for product variety design," The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 29, 2006, pp. 216-225.
  66. [51]Sidiropoulos, M., Mouzakitis, Y., Adamides, E. and Goutsos, S., "Applying Sustainable Indicators to Corporate Strategy: Eco-balanced scorecard," Environmental research, engineering and management, vol. 1, no. 27, 2004, pp. 28-33.
  67. 會議論文
  68. [57]Bieker, T. and Waxenberger, B., "Sustainability Balanced Scorecard and Business Ethics," Greening of Industry Network Conference, Göteborg/Sweden, 2002, pp. 1-24.
  69. [59]Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M., "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – a tool for value-oriented sustainability management in strategy-focused organizations," Conference Proceedings of the 2001 Eco-Management and Auditing Conference, ERP Environment: Shipley, 2001b, pp. 83-90.
  70. [60]Hockerts, K., "Corporate Sustainability Management — Towards Controlling Corporate Ecological and Social Sustainability," Proceedings of Greening of Industry Network Conference, Bangkok, 2001.
  71. [61]Orssatto, R., Zingales, F. and O’Rourke, A., "Environment and socio-related Balanced Scorecard: Towards a conceptual framework," proceedings of the 10th Business Strategy and the Environment Conference, Leeds, 2001, pp. 263-273.
  72. [62]Saaty, T. L., "Fundamentals of the analytic network process," Proceedings of In-ternational Symposium on Analytical Hierarchy Process, 1999.
  73. [63]Zingales, F., O’Rourke, A. and Orsato, R. J., "Environmental and Socio-related Scorecard: Exploration of Critical Issues." In The Ninth Annual Business Strategy and the Environment Conference, Leeds: University of Leeds, 2001.
  74. 學位論文
  75. [65]林鐘堯,國際港埠船舶交通管理系統(VTS)建置考量因素探討-以高雄港為例,碩士論文,國立高雄第一科技大學運籌管理系,高雄,2007。
  76. [66]林雯瑜,企業環境績效與綠色競爭力指標探討,碩士論文,國立台北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所,台北,2006。
  77. [67]黃雪晴,國內資訊電子業聯盟夥伴選擇模式之研究,碩士論文,國立成功大學工業管理研究所,台南,2000。
  78. [68]黃雅鈴,整合性環境績效評估架構探討-平衡計分卡與標竿管理之結合應用,碩士論文,國立台北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所,台北,2005。
  79. [70]許迪威,建設公司BSC績效評估模式之研究-應用ANP/FUZZY法,碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學營建工程系,台北,2003。
  80. [72]鄭滄濱,軟體組織提升人員能力之成熟度模糊評估模式,碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學資訊管理系,台北,2001。
  81. [74]陳哲昌,最適防災社區管理組織之研究—以山坡地社區為例,碩士論文,華梵大學工業管理研究所,台北,2002。
  82. [75]褚秀敏,關鍵成功因素與績效評估制度關連性之研究-以郵局為例,碩士論文,國立台灣大學會計學研究所,台北,1998。
  83. [76]吳弘毅,整合分析網路程序法及目標規劃模式於都市地區更新方案選擇之研究,碩士論文,朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所,台中,2005。
  84. 網路資訊或報告
  85. [78]台灣半導體產業協會 http://www.tsia.org.tw/
  86. [79]經濟部投資業務處 http://www.dois.moea.gov.tw/
  87. [80]Bieker, T., Dyllick, T., Gminder, C. and Hockerts, K., Management unternehmerischer Nachhaltigkeit mit einer Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – Forschungsmethodische Grundlagen und erste Konzepte, IWOe-Diskussionsbeitrag Nr.94, St.Gallen, 2001.
  88. [83]Figge, F., Wertschaffendes Umweltmanagement, PricewaterhouseCoopers: Frankfurt, 2001.
  89. [84]The SIGMA Project, THE SIGMA GUIDELINES-TOOLKIT: SUSTAINABILITY SCORECARD, Published by the SIGMA Project, London, 2003.
  90. [85]Zingales, F. and Hockerts, K., Balanced Scorecard and Sustainability: Examples from Literature and Practice, CMER Research Programme Manager, 2003.
Times Cited
  1. 樊秉鑫(2013)。結合企業永續與卓越經營模式之研究。臺北科技大學環境工程與管理研究所學位論文。2013。1-164。 
  2. 陳育琪(2013)。研擬古蹟、歷史建築保存與修復專業能力。臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所學位論文。2013。1-197。 
  3. 彭致和(2008)。以永續發展觀點探討垃圾焚化廠延長服役問題。臺北科技大學環境工程與管理研究所學位論文。2008。1-161。 
  4. 林志宏(2012)。以ANP建置製造業導入RFID指標分析之決策機制。元智大學工業工程與管理學系學位論文。2012。1-73。 
  5. 戴秀蓉(2014)。重度網路購物者之購買決策關鍵因素研究:ANP法之應用。中正大學企業管理學系學位論文。2014。1-107。
  6. 蔡美莉(2016)。運用DEMATEL決策實驗室分析法探討永續性平衡計分卡關鍵因素-以製造業為例。臺中科技大學企業管理系碩士班學位論文。2016。1-106。